tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-333648532024-02-29T23:39:59.108-06:00Fluffy's WorldWritings by Fluffy Singler on teaching, writing, book reviews, poetry, theatre, performance, arts, politics, and sometimes general life frustrations.
(Please note that all of the photos here, if not of Fluffy, have been taken by her, and are copyrighted, just like the writings herein. If you want to use something, please contact me for permissions.)Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.comBlogger182125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-10708218600538195902019-08-21T13:19:00.002-05:002020-09-11T16:06:56.027-05:00The Power of a Good Sentence | The Walrus<a href="https://thewalrus.ca/the-power-of-a-good-sentence/#.XV2LLbEXh7M.blogger">The Power of a Good Sentence | The Walrus</a>: Why writing a great sentence isn't as easy as you think.Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-17468517608748806342017-11-27T15:08:00.000-06:002020-05-26T12:15:15.465-05:00Dear John Letter and untitled poemThese are two things I created at a writing workshop recently. I think they hang together pretty well.<br />
<br />
Dear John:<br />
<br />
Unlike a doctor telling a child bad news, with a spoonful of sugar, with chocolate milk concealing the teaste, offering them something they like to drink, there will be none of that now. You will be getting it straight, not slant. No sugar coating is going to make this more palatable, tastier, easier to swallow. I am leaving. Let those words roll around in your mind, on your tongue, and taste the bitterness.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
untitled (for now)<br />
<br />
You sound like a roken record, skipping over key words nd notes, scratching across the surface and getting stuck at some point, always talking talking talking talking about the same things until something or someone flicks the needles off, shuts off the record player<br />
in disgust.<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-74590299351717332082017-11-26T15:10:00.001-06:002017-11-26T16:53:27.860-06:00Barometric Pressures: Cubicleland -- Laura Winton<a href="http://barometricpressures.blogspot.com/2013/10/cubicleland-laura-winton.html?spref=bl">Barometric Pressures: Cubicleland -- Laura Winton</a>: Download Laura Winton's Chapbook Here Laura Winton is a poet, writer, and performance artist currently based in Minneapolis...Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-2566092576630877292017-11-26T13:20:00.001-06:002017-11-26T13:22:54.768-06:00Ecriture Feminine and Women’s Transgressive WritingEcriture Feminine and Women’s Transgressive Writing<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
A Manifesto, a poem, <br />
a performance piece, and <br />
an academic article <br />
Three French Theorists walk into a lecture hall..<br />
(Michel Foucault picks things out of the trashbin of literary history.<br />
Voila! Stephen King’s Parking Tickets<br />
Voila! Nietzsche’s Laundry List<br />
Voila! Hemingway’s hunting license<br />
Voila! Shakespeare’s supposed (typed) manuscript of his complete works<br />
Barthes says L’auter est mort! Vive le lecteur! But who is speaking?<br />
Foucault answers What does it matter who is speaking!?<br />
<br />
Enter Cixous: Of course it matters, you patriarchal windbags. The author isn’t dead, She’s right here!” <br />
“Why is that men on the left cannot see their own blind spots? You go on all day about the oppressors and post-colonial this and post-structural that but then you deny us our voices when it suits you, when you don’t feel the need for an author.<br />
<br />
“Who makes me write, moan, sing, dance? Who gives me the body that is never afraid of fear? Who writes me? . . . When I have finished writing, when we have returned to the air of the song that we are, the body of texts that we will have made for ourselves will become one of its names among so many others. In the beginning, there can be only dying, the abyss, the first laugh” <br />
<br />
Prologue: What is writing?<br />
<br />
What is writing? Writing is everything. Writing is<br />
communication, imagination, learning, history, memory, language, there is<br />
nothing outside the text says Derrida, and I believe it and I don't.<br />
<br />
<br />
An attempted poetic interlude<br />
<br />
Stream-of-Consciousness Internal Dialogue <br />
<br />
Writing is all the knowledge and creativity and creation and evolution and revolution and punk rock and heavy metal music and hymns and poems and treatises and manifestos and novels and academic articles and everything that we have learned and try to learn and strive to learn and<br />
know and catalogue and categorize and put into boxes marked kingdom phylum genre order class marxist proletariat species human and text and chora and Oedipus and his daddy Freud and his Mama Jocasta and Hamlet and Cleopatra the queen and the movie the woman(en) and the myth(s). How can you not be self-conscious with the weight of all that history upon you and all that knowledge and that was only half a paragraph? <br />
<br />
There is something outside the text. Unnamable feelings and joy and wild ecstatic movement and birds songs but the minute we identify it as anything at all, it moves inside the textual fence as it moves into consciousness from unconsciousness and there it sits until it becomes text and writing. <br />
What's the use of the text? If we can't get outside of the text anymore, <br />
then that makes the text a kind of . . . ideology since Zizek's theory tell us<br />
that it is impossible to get outside of our own ideologies, outside of our own heads, outside of the text. Stupid Derrida. I hate it when he's right (write).<br />
Death of the Author: God and Mother, a Parable<br />
<br />
In the Judeo-Christian tradition, the text, the word, is sacred. We cannot seem to get out of the tradition. For all of their post-modernism and the agnosticism that frequently comes with that, Barthes (and Derrida) also come out of a French tradition which was very very Catholic. Thus, I am going to make the story of the death of the author, male and female, into a comparative parable. <br />
<br />
In Christianity, Jesus (the author) must die and be resurrected so that believers (readers) can have safe passage to heaven (the text). This is the male-centered conception of the author as the all-knowing keeper of the text and of meaning. And in fact, Barthes speaks of “the ‘message’ of the Author-God” and says that “to refuse to fix its meaning is, in the end, to refuse God and his hypostases – reason, science, law” . <br />
<br />
Women, however, have historically had a different relationship to birth and death, with many medieval women dying in childbirth. In this model, the woman (author) dies so that her child (the reader) may be born, but that child will be orphaned, with no one to guide her through life (the text). There is a “death/not death,” a voluntary withdrawal that happens here that can be seen as Cixous’ metaphor for the author. Cixous also talks about the (female) author as continuing “to have what she has eternally, to not lose having, to be pregnant with having is . . . the text, already in the child, in the woman . . . ” The woman is birthing the text, bringing it into being, and like giving birth, some of herself with leave her along with the text. But that text will not necessitate a death for the author. If the reader is a co-creator in meaning, as with Barthes, the author-mother will do so in conjunction with, not opposed to, the reader and the text.<br />
<br />
Gender and Genre<br />
<br />
All of this brings me back to Amy Shuman's “Gender and Genre,” about a possible “rejection” or at least radical rethinking of academic work and what it means to be academic, what it means for women who have traditionally done “expressive” writing – short stories and fiction, storytelling, to rethink and remake what constitutes academic writing. Is it necessarily less rigorous? What potential do we have to remake academic writing and not have it devalued, like so many things in culture become once they are associated with women and with women's work? Is rigor always to be male-defined? Must we adhere to traditionally “male” academic standards that we had no role in setting, but must maintain, nonetheless? And if we choose to change those standards or to not uphold and maintain those standards any more, will our own work be less valid? What would the new standards look like?<br />
<br />
Right away on the first page of the article she talks “how people negotiate the categories that are imposed upon them” . Many of the restrictions of academic writing predate women’s mass entrance into the academy and represent patriarchal categories of what “counts” as academic writing, what “counts” as academic publishing, etc. I have underlined at least half of the first page in the book because it says so much that I have come to love and agree with. <br />
<br />
Theories of gender and genre converge in their exploration of the problems of classification and the disruption of boundaries. Genre is often gendered . . . . Gender scholarship questions how cultural categories are reproduced and under what conditions women are complicit with or resistant to the reproduction of conventions. <br />
Shuman continues, talking about the way that “genre classification systems could represent the values of a culture ”, and the way that “genre systems are as much about disputes, maintenance, and shifting of boundaries ”. Thus, it is no wonder that feminists coming to academic would question those kinds of boundaries.<br />
<br />
Sol LeWitt's Sentences on Conceptualism question the use of rationality in art, and by extension writing, since in conceptualist art the link between the writing and theorizing and the actual making of art is dissolved. For LeWitt, “Conceptual artists are mystics rather than rationalists. They leap to conclusions that logic cannot reach.” The first four sentences are about the connection (or not) of rationality with art: <br />
<br />
1. Rational judgments repeat rational judgments.<br />
2. Irrational judgments lead to new experience.<br />
3. Formal art is essentially rational.<br />
4. Irrational thoughts should be followed absolutely and logically. <br />
<br />
Since women have been traditionally associated with irrationality, it seems that avant-garde art, at least by LeWitt's definition, would inherently be a feminine realm. Cixous carries it farther, saying that she “has no right to write within your logic: nowhere to write from.” Because she is a woman, she has “no fatherland, no legitimate history. No certainties, no property. ” With no “fatherland,” no history or tradition, a woman has no “genre,” she feels an allegiance to. It is all up for grabs for her to make her own history, her own traditions. And hence, her own, if illegitimate (in the eyes of men), genres.<br />
<br />
The Liberation of the Imagination:<br />
From “Feminine Writing” to Revolutionary Poetry <br />
<br />
In the introduction to Feminist Critique of Language, editor Deborah Cameron cites a quote by Shoshona Feldman on language that particularly resonates with me and my work on poetry, language and liberation.<br />
<br />
The challenge facing women today is nothing less than to reinvent language . . . to speak not only against but outside the structure . . . to establish a discourse the status of which would no longer be defined by the phallacy of male meaning. <br />
<br />
Cameron elaborates further upon Feldman's idea, discussing briefly the work of French Feminists such as Luce Irigaray and Helene Cixous and a search for a "feminine writing" and "women's language." Cameron also raises the other side of the debate, citing Elaine Showalter's position that the issue for women is not so much a male-based "prisonhouse of language," as Frederic Jameson says. The very fact of access and entitlement for women to speak is not the inadequacy of language, or as Judith Butler would point to, the way in which language performs, enacts, speaks into being our condition. Others reject an essentialist strain that says that women need different language than men to express their lives, their realities, their psyches, their thoughts, etc.<br />
To me the core issue here is that all marginalized, disempowered people, need access to a language of imagination. Not a replacement language per se, but a paralanguage, a language that works, functions on a completely different level than the ordinary, the quotidian, the banal, the mundane, and (consequently) the hegemonic uses of language. The language as it is now practiced, even if it is not inherently structured to protect and maintain power, it has certainly been subverted to that use, propagated in contemporary life, by the constant onslaught of mainstream media—advertising, news, the normative values promoted by almost all television programming and many movies. In insidious ways we are constantly being told what to believe, what to buy, how to act, how to be moral, how to be patriotic, how to look a certain way, how to fit in and belong in American society, etc. etc. How is one to rethink the world, remake the world, the government, the neighborhood, the culture, the communities we come from and live in, our own very daily existence, among the onslaught of images that perpetuate someone else's vision and serve up to us only the world as we already (think) we know it?<br />
<br />
To remake language to find new<br />
creative imagistic practices of language<br />
is to make resistance possible to move us<br />
toward our vision to have visions<br />
never before possible<br />
<br />
I am talking here about a language that speaks outside of the dominant discourse, whether racialized, patriarchal, class-based, etc., an un-discourses or non-discourse, a paradiscourse, that brings with it the chance to step outside, run alongside, that does not attempt to use the tools of power that already exist, but to forge new tools that could create new structures, new edifices not previously imagined. The techne, the tool, in many ways prescribes what can be built. We know that with new technology new ways of thinking emerge. So why would we not want new mental and imaginative linguistic tools of our own? As Sol LeWitt says, “rational thoughts repeat rational thoughts.” The way we think perpetuates itself, we continue to think only in the ways we've always thought. I'm not looking then for a feminine language per se, except insofar as it might offer a resistive language, a paralanguage that we can frolic in and search for something unknown, a Dada language a non-sense that leads to sense a zaum a de-formed formalism that will birth new forms. <br />
<br />
What Do Women Want?<br />
<br />
Women want to be avant-garde. <br />
We want to be on the c u t t<br />
i n g <br />
e<br />
d <br />
g<br />
e <br />
of literature, to operate <br />
(within)(outside of) the m a r g i n s. <br />
(That is where we reside anyway.)<br />
We are used to working within that area <br />
and we are <br />
good at it. <br />
<br />
We have gotten so used to it that we are not actually considered avant-garde. It comes very naturally to us. This is what Cixous is talking about when she speaks (or writes) of the ecriture feminine. If we are actually paying attention to how we function within society, even at this stage, even in 2016, we have to admit to ourselves that our involvement in culture and politics is still very radical and we operate, when we are being honest with ourselves, oppositionally.<br />
<br />
To be a woman writer or artist<br />
is to be truly <br />
and inherently <br />
avant-garde<br />
whether<br />
(you know it or not) (you call yourself that or not).<br />
The Revolutionary Work of Poetry: or, To Destroy Language<br />
"If we could change our language, that’s to say the way we think, we’d probably be able to swing the revolution," says John Cage.<br />
My own sentences on revolutionary poetics<br />
1. To restructure language is to restructure thought, to restructure possibilities. <br />
2. To scramble, if not permanently, which is impractical and will not lead to the world we want, but temporarily, the world as we (think) we know it, the language that binds us to the now, to put new ideas, new juxtapositions into play, new planets into orbit. <br />
3. As an instrument of "instruction" and propaganda, it is subject to the same pitfalls that all other forms of discourse and communication fall prey to.<br />
4. The avant garde is the "first wave," the ground work of consciousness, preparing the field. <br />
<br />
Ecriture Feminine and the Petit Mort of Writing<br />
<br />
One of my interlocutors was talking about dying little deaths, small deaths along the way of writing, this made me think of the petit mort, which is French for orgasm. And as I read Cixous and think about her ecstasy in writing, talking about the flesh at work in a labor of love, I think more and more about the petit mort as a form of women's writing . This is all over Cixous. Her writing is full of ecstatic phrases about what it is to write. She does not fear the death of the author, either actual or metaphorical. Nor does writing, for Cixous, promise immortality. It is an in the moment activity. In “The Author in Truth,” Cixous writes about “striking out for the unknown, to make our way in the dark. To see the world with the fingers: isn't this the act of writing par excellence? ” In her manifesto “Coming to Writing,” there are extended passages that are about losing yourself in mad love (amour fou, as Andre Breton wrote of), to writing, to a feminine writing. This is not a nihilistic death, as might be seen in Foucault or Barthes, but a joyous celebration of what it is to write. “The text, already the lover who savors the wait and the promise,” she explains. “Text: not a detour, but the flesh at work in a labor of love” . As if she were taking the death of the author literally, then, she says “in the beginning, there can be only dying, the abyss, the first laugh. ” In Cixous' definition of the text, I do not feel the need to repudiate stupid Derrida. I can accept that there is nothing outside of this text, this ecriture feminine in which all things live as long as they live. It is not a hedge against death nor <br />
a headlong dive into death. <br />
It is not about immortality and “what survives.” <br />
Writing is its own joy, its own reward its own pleasure. <br />
It is a petit mort that is meant to be shared. <br />
It is a revolution in language that is meant to liberate. <br />
It is a private moment, expressivist and confessional. <br />
It is everything.<br />
<br />
<br />
Bibliography<br />
<br />
Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author,” Image, Music, Text. Translated by Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang Press, 1977. p. 142-148.<br />
Barthes, Roland. “From Work to Text,” Image, Music, Text. Translated by Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang Press, 1977. p. 155-164.<br />
Cage, John. M: Writings '67-72. Hanover, NJ: Wesleyan University Press.<br />
Cameron, Deborah. The Feminist Critique of Language. New York: Routledge, 1998.<br />
Cixous, Helene. Coming to Writing and Other Essays. Translated by Deborah Jensen. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991. <br />
Derrida, Jacques. “The Law of Genre,” Bulletin of the International Colloquim on Genre. University of Strasborg, 4-8 July, 1979. Translated by Avital Ronnell. Speech.<br />
Dworkin, Craig. To destroy language", Textual Practice (18)2, 2004, 185-197.<br />
Lewitt, Sol.“Sentences on Conceptualism,” http://www.altx.com/vizarts// Referenced November 27, 2016.<br />
Shuman, Amy. “Gender and Genre,” Feminist Theory and the Study of Folklore. Susan Tower Hollis, Linda Pershing, M Jane Young, eds. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1993. p. 71-88.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEimG3JLeZ0maNDW8bqfL8DCCSgUcufaiK1kG2B30SwZybKvtttt7gLYBcX0Cue26ndye7L6yoI7MYqJN6uzOSsLSq1bX-OpP4fZbt2CTshBT6wosP_d_V61nx1-6fUH02nFPGDr/s1600/Manifesto+text+only+part+1.mp4" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEimG3JLeZ0maNDW8bqfL8DCCSgUcufaiK1kG2B30SwZybKvtttt7gLYBcX0Cue26ndye7L6yoI7MYqJN6uzOSsLSq1bX-OpP4fZbt2CTshBT6wosP_d_V61nx1-6fUH02nFPGDr/s320/Manifesto+text+only+part+1.mp4" width="320" height="240" data-original-width="320" data-original-height="240" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyizGhPcX6cj6fmvqhtNTIWlNiRsl72Fk9yfBDzHLBBt8qEycK677mHbBnovBLiRKf6TVFsvch8bopomhGL6RVszcwLtM_ctWzi2egfqpP-RX3kspLLO8ogDNA7iTGCCvhvAlY/s1600/Mainfesto+text+only+part+2.mp4" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyizGhPcX6cj6fmvqhtNTIWlNiRsl72Fk9yfBDzHLBBt8qEycK677mHbBnovBLiRKf6TVFsvch8bopomhGL6RVszcwLtM_ctWzi2egfqpP-RX3kspLLO8ogDNA7iTGCCvhvAlY/s320/Mainfesto+text+only+part+2.mp4" width="320" height="240" data-original-width="320" data-original-height="240" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn7c8GKdftkre3_ga93lDfH1Df24gawYHBBqG1urAw-UOkgbmVvse114R_XbIa3umFbKKKfAa9WsttBeTq_9TO5mIp2Jd1tqnL74C3o-XSA9wO6BYhRF8sdlHSU2Mn-s4ZhCQN/s1600/Prelude+to+the+textual+manifesto.mp4" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgn7c8GKdftkre3_ga93lDfH1Df24gawYHBBqG1urAw-UOkgbmVvse114R_XbIa3umFbKKKfAa9WsttBeTq_9TO5mIp2Jd1tqnL74C3o-XSA9wO6BYhRF8sdlHSU2Mn-s4ZhCQN/s320/Prelude+to+the+textual+manifesto.mp4" width="320" height="240" data-original-width="320" data-original-height="240" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgerjwLx9IgU4rbfgGsHD2PQEq5vOKjaU7wlDs-TlYYkja6wzE0BESRXrGvKj8bxjmzNSahqTmwEK0REtE9F_0YyzcFQ86ZyKfB2b7lr5vllkHcf1F9cH-GsZRI7skipKE2kX4q/s1600/Manifesto+text+only+part+3.mp4" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgerjwLx9IgU4rbfgGsHD2PQEq5vOKjaU7wlDs-TlYYkja6wzE0BESRXrGvKj8bxjmzNSahqTmwEK0REtE9F_0YyzcFQ86ZyKfB2b7lr5vllkHcf1F9cH-GsZRI7skipKE2kX4q/s320/Manifesto+text+only+part+3.mp4" width="320" height="240" data-original-width="320" data-original-height="240" /></a></div>Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-74260428443057653762017-06-23T11:27:00.000-05:002020-05-26T12:17:10.018-05:00Pointed Out Like the Stars: Women and the Avant-Garde<br />
I was 21 when I entered graduate school for the first time, and while it was mostly a psychological and academic disaster for me, one very important thing happened that affected me for the rest of my life. I discovered Dada. I can’t remember what precipitated my discovery of Dada. Something in my memory tells me that it was just an accident of “surfing” the library stacks. What I do remember is my first book of Dada that I came across and checked out: <i>7 Dada Manifestos and Lampisteries</i> by Tristan Tzara . I remember being hooked the first time I opened the book. A little bit later, I came across of one Tzara’s poems, “Le printemps,” or “Springtime,” of which I can still, 30 years later, recite the first line or two in French. I could not tell you what about the work attracted me, but it made me happy, then, as now. It was delightful in its esoteric non-sense and at the same time, made me feel liberated. To a very young graduate student in English, an artistic and literary movement that could inspire playfulness in literature, as opposed to weighed down with assignments that felt oppressive, made me rediscover and remember my love for literature. Even now, 30 years later, picking up a book about Dada or Surrealism, going to an exhibit, still has the same ecstatic effect on me.<br />
<br />
At that time, I wasn’t thinking about women in the avant-garde. I didn’t think about the fact that women were not highly visible among avant-garde movements. Frankly, women were not highly visible in most literary movements. The women involved in literary movements were anomalies. That was what made them special—a woman among so many male writers. Moreover, this was the middle 1980s. Growing up female in the 1970s, in the midst of second wave feminism, which I was also oblivious to at the time, I was raised to believe that I could do anything, participate in anything. When, years later, I did enter the fray of discussions about women in the avant-garde, I would initially assume that, sure, women were not represented, but that was then and this is now. Moreover, criticism of the lack of (visible) women that were made, either historically or in the present, did not apply to me. I did not see myself as frivolous, I was not a “girly-girl.” I was a young woman who could hold her own with any boy or man, especially when it came to intellect. I was special, like those other women. If there were not very many women historically in the avant-garde, that did not affect the women of today who could do whatever they chose to do. It would not be until years later that I would question where the women of the avant-garde were and why no one seemed to be talking about them. It seemed some of them had to become visible to me before I could ask where the rest of them were.<br />
<br />
Fast forward to November 2016. I attend a 100th anniversary of Dada celebration at a small gallery in Chicago, where I meet Penelope Rosemont herself, the legendary American Surrealist from Chicago who had, by all accounts, met Andre Breton and received, along with her husband Franklin, Breton’s blessing to start a Surrealist group in the United States. As this is the last weekend of the exhibition, attendance is slight. The four people in the room at the time, myself included, look and comment on the irony that 100 years later, it is a group of women exclusively that are celebrating Dada. The tide has turned.<br />
<br />
<b>The Avant-Garde: A Man’s World?</b><br />
<br />
When you think of Dada and Surrealism, the “first” major avant-gardes, what names come to mind? Number one is probably Andre Breton. Marcel Duchamp. Tristan Tzara. Man Ray. Salvador Dali. It is only once we have used up most of the male names that we might remember Leonora Carrington, or Dorothea Tanning, Kay Sage, Frida Kahlo, Mary Laban, Sophie Tauber, Baroness Elsa, or Mina Loy. When we think about contemporary scholarship on women in the avant-garde or any literary movement, we can look at the numbers and who gets published in major anthologies, how the women get counted and talked about in that movement, and who the scholars are that are “writing women back into the canon.”<br />
<br />
<b>Surrealist Women by the numbers</b><br />
<br />
In 1998, Penelope Rosemont published a very influential volume entitled <i>Surrealist Women</i>. The anthology includes a total of just under 100 women, although she drew from a much higher number. Many of them are the most prominent names in Surrealism, Nancy Cunard, Meret Oppenheim, Leonora Carrington, Frida Kahlo, etc. Rosemont describes her method in detail:<br />
<br />
I consulted a vast number of surrealist journals, exhibition catalogues, and other publications. Whenever I came across the name of a woman, I noted it on a file card. According to these cards, some three hundred women—at one time or another, to one degree or another—have taken part in the international Surrealist Movement. (xxxvi).<br />
<br />
Three hundred women, and yet at best, most people even in the know could probably only name about 25 women from Dada and Surrealism combined, maybe 50 if they are really knowledgeable. <br />
<br />
In that volume, organized chronologically, there are 11 women from the 1920s and 24 different women published in the 1930s, (vii-x) the period when according to Mary Ann Caws, women began to become more visible within Surrealism (Surrealism and Woman, 2). There were 17 unique women in the section before the end of WWII, and 27 unique women listed as post-War, from the end of the WWII to 1960. In period of the 1960s and 70s there are 24 unique women published, and 16 in the final chapter, that goes up to the 1990s (Surrealist Women, x-xx). <br />
<br />
Contrast this with Willard Bohn’s 1993 anthology, <i>The Dada Market: An Anthology of Poetry</i>, which contains only 4 women out of 42 poets: Celine Arnauld, Baroness Elsa von Freitag-Loringhoven, Emmy Hennings, and Mina Loy (vii). <i>Arsenal: Surrealist Subversions</i>, a journal which was edited by Rosemont’s own Chicago Surrealist Group and was published sporadically in the 1970s and 80s had approximately 15 different women writers and artists in the issue I examined, as well as statements from a number of Surrealist groups worldwide which no doubt (or hopefully) included women, out of roughly 70 entries (1).<br />
<br />
Today, there are also any number of Facebook pages devoted to contemporary Surrealist practices. As of February 15th, looking at two different FB pages, Surrealist Revolution and Surrealism and Esotericism, there were 155 women out of 532 members of Surrealist Revolution and 67 women out of 211 total members of Surrealism and Esotericism, which comes to roughly 1/3 in each group (and there is some overlap between the two lists, but there are also some discrete names a well). There were a few cases where the names were ambiguous and not obviously women, and which further had no identifying pictures, so I counted those as men. However, it is the men who are more visible on these lists, whereas the women tend to “lurk” on these particular lists, mostly posting when they have something to share, as opposed to getting involved in discussions. Is this because they have been discouraged in the past? Is it because they are busy being artists and moms and wives and employees—maybe being teachers of art and/or students--all in varying proportions and simply don’t have time? Are they doing Surrealism as opposed to talking about it? Is it something else altogether for some of them? <br />
<br />
In fact, when I posted something to these two lists , telling a little bit about my project and asking them to respond to my gmail account, lists which I regularly participate in and which were selected for that very reason, I got no responses at all and only one man “liked” my comment. Is it possible that no women got word of my call to participate? Is it that women don’t want to think about their participation in avant-garde movements or assume, like I did, that the issue is one of history and not a current concern? Are they tired of talking about it? I will never know, of course, why my call failed to generate a single response, but those questions are interesting to speculate on, in and of themselves. I was disappointed. I wanted to know if other women’s experiences were the same as mine were, what their paths were to the avant-garde. For the moment, I will have to defer this knowledge.<br />
<br />
There is also the issue of women not wanting to be featured in women-only anthologies. Rosemont talks about this in the introduction to Surrealist Women when she talks about Anne Ethuin, who “declined to participate in one such ‘No Men Allowed’ collection” (xxx). Ethuin responded by writing:<br />
<br />
I have never thought that art and poetry could have a sex. On days when I feel the urge to write or create images, I do not decide before I begin that I am going to make ‘a woman’s work. I have lived and worked for forty-seven years in a perfectly mixed milieu and I have no intention of changing now. (qtd in Rosemont, Surrealist Women, xxxi).<br />
<br />
Rosemont’s response to a statement like this is that she sees Surrealist Women as being about “reintegration . . . to make it impossible—or at least inexcusable—for student of surrealism to continue to ignore” these women and their writings. This is what Royce and Kirsch would call the work of “historical rescue, recovery, and (re)inscription” that feminist scholars engage in (20). <br />
<br />
<b>Men in the Avant-Garde: Oppressors or Champions of Women?</b><br />
<br />
There is some disagreement among scholars about how complicit the Dada and Surrealist men were in suppressing the history of that/those movement(s) . Some, like Penelope Rosemont, say that the men deeply respected the women in the movement and supported women’s rights. Others say that the men used the women as sexual beings (or objects) to show how sexually liberated the male artists were, while still not affording the women their own independence and sexuality. In the introduction to Women in Dada, Naomi Sawelson-Gorse has some fairly biting things to say about the male attitudes towards women, as expressed in their own writings and manifestos. Sawelson-Gorse discusses New York Dadaist Paul Haviland, who talked about machines as female in not-so-flattering terms:<br />
<br />
Man made machine in his own image. She has limbs which act . . . a nervous system through which runs electricity . . . The machine is his ‘daughter born without a mother.’ This is why he loves her. (xi).<br />
<br />
She also cites Francis Picabia, who, writing in a similar vein, that “the machine is yet at a dependent stage . . . she submits to his will but he must direct her activities. Sawelson-Gorse sees the irony here, declaring that “this movement of absolute rebellion was also one of oppression” (xii). She also cites a manifesto by Tzara (my man!) as embedded in binary difference: female concerns are superficial, bound in commodifications of bodily vanity (such as skin creams and nail polish) in direct opposition to those of the male in the innovative sphere, particularly the innovative. (xi)<br />
<br />
There are a number of books and articles that detail and debate the Dada’s and Surrealists’ attitudes toward women, and so my intention here is not to write the “definitive” account of those attitudes by any means, nor do I intend to significantly rehash those debates. And if feminist scholars have taught us anything, it is to pay attention to the particulars, rather than the broad brushes that movements are painted with. No doubt, there were men who truly championed women, those who saw women as frivolous and not worth their attention, and those men who thought they were being liberatory and open-minded, but who missed the mark. My intention here is simply to bring up those issues as a part of the reason that women have been excluded from the canon of the avant-garde for many years. The lack of support and champions of women’s work, either consciously or unconsciously must be mentioned.<br />
<br />
And yet, there were still a number of women who chose to be a part of Dada around the world, in New York, France, Zurich, and Berlin. Perhaps like me, they assumed that the men who wrote things like Tzara, Picabia, and Haviland had written were not writing about them. They were different, liberated, artistic. Many were suffragists . These women deserved the liberation that Dada and similar movements promised. Perhaps these women, faced with no real alternative in men’s perceptions of them, decided to cast their lot with Dadaism, which was at least politically and artistically liberating. <br />
<br />
In the 1970s, French feminist and Surrealist Helene Cixous wrote that she “has no right to write within your logic: nowhere to write from.” Because she is a woman, she has “no fatherland, no legitimate history. No certainties, no property. ” With no “fatherland,” no history or tradition, a woman has no “genre,” she feels an allegiance to. It is all up for grabs for her to make her own history, her own traditions. What better place, then, for women in the early 20th century than in the Dada movement, even if the men didn’t totally support them. The women in and affiliated or associated with Dada were liberated, despite these male attitudes, including Baroness Elsa, Mina Loy, Sophie Tauber, Emmy Hennings, and many more. Being liberated does not always equal visibility or acceptance. I was told by someone online, for instance, that Emmy Hennings, girlfriend and later wife of Hugo Ball, who wrote poetry and participated in the Cabaret Voltaire, was not an artist and was simply a prostitute. This despite the fact that she appeared in plenty of anthologies and wrote the introduction to Ball’s memoir <i>Flight Out of Time.</i><br />
<br />
Another aspect that the Hennings story brings to light and that also threatens to obscure women’s recognition within these movements is the fact that very often the women participants were the wives or girlfriends of the men involved in the movement. Thus seen as “appendages” of the men, their participation is subsumed into the man’s artistic participation, at least in the eyes of critics, if we are to accept Rosemont’s story. Elise Breton, Suzanne Duchamp, Jeanette Tanguy, Nadja, and Gala Dali are just a few of the women who are often noted as wives and girlfriends, as “muses,” but rarely recognized as artists in their own right. <br />
<br />
Mary Ann Caws contends that this is part of the problematic history of Surrealism itself, when she says that “although the work is praised, the woman is not granted autonomous artist powers” (2). Caws also notes that women “joined Surrealism through personal relationships with male members” (2). Was it that the women actually participated because their husbands or partners were Surrealists, or was it that the men were attracted to the women because they shared similar interests in art and attitudes toward creativity? <br />
<br />
<b>By the numbers: contemporary redux</b><br />
<br />
The erasure of women from avant-garde and experimental histories continues with contemporary movements of today, feminism notwithstanding. I remember reading a quote by Gregory Corso of the “Beat Generation” who said (and I paraphrase) “sure there were women there [among the Beats] and someday people will write about them.” I had talked to Maria Damon, professor at the University of Minnesota and a beat generation scholar/apologist about that quote and she told me “Gregory Corso is such a mess. He is not one to be responsible for that kind of scholarship.” The point is not that Gregory Corso himself should be responsible for bringing those writers to light, but as Angela Davis famously said, “Lift as you climb.” In other words, male authors could or should stop allowing the story of the “holy trinity” of the Beats – Kerouac, Ginsberg, Burroughs—from being the only history of the Beat movement and take greater pains to mention some of the women writers, besides Dianne DiPrima, who were there and worked with them, read by their sides, and did much more than sleep with them, cook their dinners, etc. As the men are lifted up, they should also be mentioning and lifting up the women with whom they built the movement, not waiting for someone else to “discover” those writers, who should have already been “discovered” by virtue of their participation. <br />
<br />
The Language Poets, inheritors of the Dada tradition, do a slightly better job, with about a dozen women writers out of a 280 page anthology, <i>The L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E Book</i>, in which most articles, poetry, and fiction run from 1-3 pages (v-viii). Being generous, this means that there is approximately 36 pages worth of women’s writing in this book. At a Conceptual Poetics conference that I attended in 2007, which featured many prominent Language Poets, nearly half of the attendees were women, yet we were still having discussions about gender, since the then-upcoming Conceptual Poetics anthology, which ended up being published in 2011 under the name <i>Against Expression</i> and was edited by Craig Dworkin and Kenneth Goldsmith, was not going to reflect women’s participation and the nearly equal participation of women to men at the conference. And as usual with discussions like this, most of the men got defensive . Marjorie Perloff sided with the men, saying something to the effect that it wasn’t their job to ensure equal participation of men and women. The finished anthology has approximately 100-110 pages of women’s writing, representing approximately 25 women, out of a total of 593 pages (vii-xvi).<br />
<br />
<b>Women as Scholars of the Avant-Garde</b><br />
<br />
Many women have been written back into the histories of the avant-garde, and this is, no doubt, due to women becoming scholars of the avant-garde as well. One of the most prominent and prolific of these is Mary Ann Caws, who has edited and translated dozens of books by and about avant-garde writers, has edited or contributed to more than a dozen books specifically about women in and around the avant-garde, including the 1991 critical edition of <i>Surrealism and Women</i>. In addition to Caws, there are a number of other women scholars of the avant-garde, including Whitney Chadwick, who has written about Frida Kahlo and other women of the avant-garde, or scholar Patricia Allmer, who is almost as prolific a writer on the avant-garde as Caws is. As more women not only enter the academy, but show an interest in the avant-garde, we learn more about women of the avant-garde. Thus, it is important to know the names of the scholars who are unearthing women buried under the mounds of male artists that have obscured their own contributions. After all, if, as Comte L’autremont is endlessly quoted in Surrealist book after Surrealist book, “poetry must be made by all,” then that must include women, as part of that “all.” <br />
<br />
Echoing Cixous’ comments about how women have “no fatherland” and no stable place from which to write, Jacquline Jones Royster and Gesa Kirsch argue in <i>Feminist Rhetorical Practices</i> that women “need to claim a space for research at the edges (rather than the center) of the field, to claim an interdisciplinary space in the field” (6). Thus, it seems that to be female is to be inherently avant-garde, whether you are an artist or a scholar. What we are doing is inherently revolutionary and liberatory. <br />
<br />
In addition to publishing the anthology Surrealist Women in 1998, Penelope Rosemont, a member of the Chicago Surrealists, has brought women like Toyen to light in her own memoirs and manifestos, as well as casually mentioning other women, as if to say that their participation in Surrealism should not be seen as shocking or separate, but to simply be recognized as being in the room. Of course, another way that women make themselves known, both in and outside of avant-garde movements is to write their own memoirs. Penelope Rosemont has written several autobiographical books, including <i>Dreams and Everyday Life</i> and <i>Surrealist Experiences: 1001 Dawns, 221 Midnights</i> and a co-authored a book entitled T<i>he Forecast is Hot! Tracts and Other Declarations of the Surrealist Movement in the United States</i>, all of which talk about Rosemont’s own experiences with the Surrealists in Paris in the late 1960s and beyond. Yet Rosemont’s own participation in Surrealism has been questioned in the behind-the-scene discussions of her Wikipedia page, in which one person kept taking down references to her having met Andre Breton and having Breton's blessing for a Surrealist Group in Chicago, claiming there is no evidence that she and her husband Franklin had ever met Breton. I, personally, have never heard of someone’s memoirs being questioned in such a manner, unless it is proven that the memoir is false. This incident is emblematic of the struggles that women face to be included in the canon of the avant-garde. There is no such discussion on Franklin Rosemont’s page.<br />
<br />
<b>Scholarship of Women in the Avant-Garde: Who “Counts”</b><br />
<br />
Even now, in 2017, when I went to the <i>Documenting Dada</i> Exhibit at the University of Iowa, there were two pages from the Dadaist journal <i>391</i> that had artwork done by women. It was mentioned in the program, but the women’s names were omitted. This despite the fact they were clearly visible on the pages and that someone could have investigated further and written about them. (The names were not as visible/legible through the class that contained the pages.) Were they anomalies in the Dada movement, only published or participating once or for a very short period of time? Or were they actively involved? As of 2017, apparently we do not know the answers to that question. <br />
<br />
Rosemont contends that “until very recently most of the literature on women surrealists was written by other surrealists, male and female.” She goes on to note that “if these women remain little known to the larger reading public it is because critics and scholars have been shirking their responsibilities” (xxx). In fact, canon development is and remains a significant issue for women writers of all kinds, as has been documented by feminist scholars for approximately 50 years. Who is left in the canon are usually the “founders” of movements and the most visible, through the writing of their memoirs. Those are often men, as well. That said, even Andre Breton’s 1966 volume <i>Surrealism and Painting</i> has 52 discrete chapters on painters, of which 5 are about women (Breton, np). In a book entitled <i>Lost Profiles: Memoirs of Cubism, Dada, and Surrealism</i> by leading Surrealist Philip Souppault, translated from the French and published in the US in 2016, there is not a single chapter on any woman. Despite that, it was hailed by many, including Paul Auster, Pierre Joris, and Andrei Codrescu who has taken up the modern cause of Surrealism and published the literary journal called <i>Exquisite Corpse</i>. It would seem, then, that omission is not just errors on the part of critics. The men of Surrealism have failed to mention the women who worked beside them. It is up to female scholars to look back for their heroes and bring them into the light of day.<br />
<br />
<b>Conclusion</b><br />
<br />
As more women enter academia, more women get showcased and added to various canons of writing. There is no “one canon,” but rather many. There is an avant-garde canon, and because that canon is so new, it is also easily expanded to include women. However, we cannot count on men, as seemingly sympathetic as they may be, to include women—their writings, their biographies, their existence. Even recent history shows us that despite improvements over the past century, there are still blind spots that will be largely corrected by women scholars in the foreseeable future, unearthing these women.<br />
<br />
<b>Post-Script: Note on Method</b><br />
<br />
I have chosen to use my own memories and knowledge in places and often to use that to compare what other women’s experience of the avant-garde might have been or might be. There are several places where I talk about my memories of conversations I have had with scholars, with people through Facebook, etc., as back up information, as another way of talking about what I have experienced or have talked about or have known about the avant-garde over the years.<br />
<br />
I have also conflated Dada and Surrealism. I could add to this Italian Futurism and Russian Formalism, but I am not as familiar with the latter two movements. Dada led directly into Surrealism and a number of Surrealists, including Breton and Dali, among many many others, started off in Dada. If the transition was not seamless, it was relatively smooth and in many ways, the goals of the two movements were similar. These two movements are also considered among the first avant-gardes, from which later avant-garde and experimental literary movements would take inspiration. <br />
<br />
Finally, I used Wikipedia here to show attitudes towards the people and subjects that I am talking about. There is a time and a place for traditional scholarship, and there is also a time and a place to talk about what is commonly known or understood in the popular imagination. I can think of no better place to trace the history of those attitudes combined with scholarship than Wikipedia. <br />
<br />
<b>Works Cited</b><br />
<br />
Andrews, Bruce, and Charles Bernstein. The L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E Book. Poetics of the New. Carbondale Ill.: Southern Illinois University P, 1984.<br />
Bohn, Willard. The Dada Market: An Anthology of Poetry. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University P, 1993.<br />
Breton, Andre. Surrealism and Painting. Simon Watson Taylor, trans. New York, NY: Icon Editions, Harper & Row P, 1966.<br />
Caws, Mary Ann, et al, editors. Surrealism and Women. MIT P, 1991.<br />
Cixous, Helene. Coming to Writing and Other Essays. Translated by Deborah Jensen. Harvard UP, 1991.<br />
Dworkin, Craig and Goldsmith, Kenneth. Against Expression: An Anthology of Conceptual Writing. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP, 2011.<br />
Facebook. “Member List,” Surrealism and Esotericism. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1586657041590569/members/ <br />
Facebook. “Member List,” La Revolution Surrealiste. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1578166949079758/members/<br />
Rosemont, Penelope. Dreams and Everyday Life: Andre Breton, Surrealism, Rebel Worker, SDS, and the Seven Cities of Cibala, a Sixties Journal. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr. 2008.<br />
---. Surrealist Experiences: 1001 Dawns, 221 Midnights. Surrealist Editions, Black Swan P, 2000.<br />
---. Surrealist Women. Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1998.<br />
Royster, Jacqueline Jones and Gesha E. Kirsch. Feminist Rhetorical Practices: New Horizons for Rhetoric, Composition, and Literary Studies. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University P, 2012.<br />
Sawselson-Gorse, Naomi, editor. Women in Dada. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 1998.<br />
Shipe, Timothy. Documenting Dada//Disseminating Dada. Exhibition Guide. Iowa City: University of Iowa Libraries, 2017. <br />
Souppault, Phillipe. Lost Profiles: Memoirs of Cubism, Dada, and Surrealism. Alan Bernheimer, trans. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books, 2016.<br />
Wikipedia. Penelope Rosemont, Talk Tab. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Penelope_Rosemont<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-80357882887822124422017-06-22T13:51:00.000-05:002017-06-22T13:51:21.828-05:00Dentists I Have Known (and maybe inspired?)I love my dentist. My mother was terrified of dentists and she usually had to be dragged to the dentist in pain and be knocked out in order to survive the trip. I love all dentists because, for the most part, a dentist can't kill you accidentally. They have to try. As far as doctors go, I tell people four words: Andy Warhol. Routine appendectomy.<br />
<br />
My current dentist reminds me of George Takei, for his sense of humor as well as his looks. George Takei's witty posts on Facebook are now legendary and my dentist keeps me laughing as well. Even when I am sitting in the chair with him working on my teeth. <br />
<br />
I recently gave him and his assistant a bunch of my postcards with my artwork, photography, and my poetry on them. While I was waiting for the novocaine to kick in, he started looking at my Surrealistic drawings trying to find recognizable shapes and faces in them, and reading my poetry, Then he started "riffing" himself, coming up with dental-inspired lines I could use in my poetry. This is exactly what Helena Lewis describes in the book <i>Dada Turns Red</i>, which I often reference, and what I am trying to do with my poetry every single day of my life.<br />
<br />
The Surrealists, she writes, held the "belief that talent is irrelevant and that everyone has creative potential in their unconscious" (173). I don't want anyone to see that writing is something mysterious that only some people have a talent for. I think that my dentist is very creative, whether he has been encouraged to express that or not. <br />
<br />
I have also regaled him with stories of previous dentists, including a discount dentist that I went to in the Quad Cities about 25 years ago. He wore a Hawaiian shirt and sang very loudly to his muzak. "I just called/to say/I love YOOOUUU." When he came at me to pull my back tooth with a giant pair of what looked to be pliers, I remember thinking, "Is that axle grease on those pliers?" He also -- and as Dave Barry would say, we are not making this up -- he put his foot on the chair for leverage to yank out my tooth. Later, the chair became my face as I told the story. <i>That</i> part I made up. <br />
<br />
Needless to say, it was a while before I ever went back to the dentist. But that could also be because you almost never used to get dental insurance unless you had a pretty good job, which I rarely did. At least not the kind of job that provided me with ANY kind of insurance at all.<br />
<br />
I still think insurance is a poor reason to work a job that you don't really want to work. I will carry that to my grave with me, bad teeth and all.<br />
<br />
I had another dentist, which I haven't talked about with my current dentist (let's call him Dr. Sulu, after George Takei's character on <i>Star Trek</i>), but whom I think about every time I sit in THE CHAIR (again, with props to my mom). This dentist was chosen because his office was not even a block from my apartment in Minneapolis. He was 70 if he was a day. And although it might be perfectly innocent dentist banter, he would often talk about my tongue. "You have a good strong tongue there," and "tongue wants to see what is going on." It was creepy. And frankly, none of my other dentists have ever talked that way. <br />
<br />
After that, I would just go to the free clinic to get my teeth pulled. (Until the dreaded Obamacare, which fascistically provided me with both medical and dental insurance. How dare he!)<br />
<br />
I had another dentist in Minneapolis who was really nice to me, didn't rag me about the condition of my teeth, and fixed them up before I left town, although there are visible seems where the fillings are. Dr. Sulu will need to repair those, hopefully. <br />
<br />
Dr. Sulu has been quite interested in what I do, the readings that I go to in Chicago, the open mic that I hold at the laundromat, about my thesis topic, etc. I hope that in some small way I have inspired him, made him smile, with both my stories/tales and with my poetry and art work, just as he has contributed to my life by giving me back my smile.<br />
<br />
(Come on, you saw that ending coming, didn't you!?)Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-12841532500305099242017-06-22T13:02:00.000-05:002017-06-22T13:08:47.530-05:00Democracy, anti-intellectualism, and "proletariat" artI am watching the Surrealist documentary <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLL9A0Dhisk&index=5&list=PLXMIsD_SNAk5_5d8RjTzz_1Esjrnav7tK&t=2306s">Europe After the Rain</a>. They are talking about Breton’s argument with the Soviet Union about whether or not Surrealism could be a good representation of the proletariat, being bourgeois art and all. Breton says that to the extent that culture is proletariat, it is not yet culture and to the extent that art is bourgeois it cannot be proletariat. <br />
<br />
Now, nearly 100 years later, the irony is that there are entire generations, starting with the Beat generation and those who returned from the war under the GI Bill that allowed them to get college educations, of “proletarian” artists, of artists who have been influenced by Dada and Surrealism, who founded Fluxus and Conceptualism and all manners of avant-garde movements. This is Republicans’ worst nightmare and the reason that they are working so hard to defund education, to stop the teaching of critical thinking, to provide only STEM, not STEAM, to education, so that they can grow generations of educated drones who will do the technical work of society without trying to transform it. What once drove this country was not technical proficiency, but the imagination required to innovate. But that imagination comes at a cost. <br />
<br />
Free-thinking people who can imagine other possibilities, will not accept attempts to control them. That’s why intellectuals must be attacked as elitists and made into the “enemies of the people,” much like what was done in the former Soviet Union to the dissidents: artistic, scientific, and political. We now have a “proletarian” art, even if we don’t have much of a proletariat, or working class, left in the United States. All people need to see artists, avant-garde or not, as being on their side, not being “elitists” opposed to their goals, but as allies, working side by side with them to achieve their goals. <br />
<br />
The physicist Andrei Sakharov said, "Everyone wants to have a job, be married, have children, be happy, but dissidents must be prepared to see their lives destroyed and those dear to them hurt. When I look at my situation and my family's situation and that of my country, I realize that things are getting steadily worse." <br />
<br />
We denounce any attempt to divide and conquer those of us who are not part of the ruling elite. We must stand together against the real enemy, not allow ourselves to be pitted against one another. The “first wave” of this coming together is art, is the avant-garde, those who will prepare the way of imagination so that we can return to creating, innovating, and evolving.Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-5786705419833307312017-03-19T12:59:00.000-05:002017-06-22T13:09:36.736-05:00New Dada-inspired poetryHere are some new poems I have been working on recently.<br />
<br />
Glossolalic Angel Dada won the Midwest Writing Center's Iron Poem contest.<br />
<br />
These poems are all saved as graphics due to their enjambment. I didn't want them to lose their spacing.<br />
<br />
Hope you like them. Leave me a message and tell me what you think.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKVqWDZmx649MZ4lRjLTIuH8779baALcMuofIFhNAW5NUE4VwdGQeRvFXQoEK1n8wHsc1heXw_FvBa_g-AlB8jmwWEA94pn8KEHOYrIYhBXCsysogeDj50kh6P0jLHgcKXdsq0/s1600/glossolalic+angel+dada.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKVqWDZmx649MZ4lRjLTIuH8779baALcMuofIFhNAW5NUE4VwdGQeRvFXQoEK1n8wHsc1heXw_FvBa_g-AlB8jmwWEA94pn8KEHOYrIYhBXCsysogeDj50kh6P0jLHgcKXdsq0/s400/glossolalic+angel+dada.JPG" width="316" height="400" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNq5iNSLbXFAldCZItZGgL-aORqwltfixCYdSi9gwJ4KBJdUaXFqWqG9SRZ-7ug_3Q10ELgHeuTKEvh7h54ak1jV_oUlZ1Hx8CmoQm-aoVfp0bBMnqnxasKm_hgEdjZTb_rS1k/s1600/mother+earth+is+sick.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNq5iNSLbXFAldCZItZGgL-aORqwltfixCYdSi9gwJ4KBJdUaXFqWqG9SRZ-7ug_3Q10ELgHeuTKEvh7h54ak1jV_oUlZ1Hx8CmoQm-aoVfp0bBMnqnxasKm_hgEdjZTb_rS1k/s400/mother+earth+is+sick.JPG" width="400" height="258" /></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhsfz-RWUW1QB_hf-Ui3eE7I0jT9OrRZsCuzjiXcDGIV2vv7LSvN4ColBgd_1Lzr_NGxRnYInHunAjcza7_PeJaWFIeC-Bou5IH5uCoTHRxRny1G06YTpo8_i5NF7rBDG7F-wfM/s1600/Tradewinds.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhsfz-RWUW1QB_hf-Ui3eE7I0jT9OrRZsCuzjiXcDGIV2vv7LSvN4ColBgd_1Lzr_NGxRnYInHunAjcza7_PeJaWFIeC-Bou5IH5uCoTHRxRny1G06YTpo8_i5NF7rBDG7F-wfM/s400/Tradewinds.JPG" width="400" height="247" /></a></div>Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-68938679531872603632017-03-17T11:16:00.000-05:002017-03-17T11:16:04.191-05:00Axes of Evil (A Gothic Political Fable)I entered this into the Quad Cities' Iron Pen Contest, sponsored by the Midwest Writing Center.<br />
<br />
Axes of (Good and) Evil<br />
A gothic political fable<br />
<br />
Carrie sped through the tv channels trying desperately to find something to watch without having to witness the nightly parade of horrors that now greeted her with evening news. Satellite TV wasn’t much better. Kardashians. Cartoons. CNN. CNN Global. CNN Entertainment – more Kardashians. CNN Sports with Caitlyn Jenner. Then there was the biggest horror of them all, the actual CNN, which featured a menacing orange guy every night talking about how he was going to fire everyone in the country and send them all to Mexico. The media. The comedians. The cabinet. This was ridiculous. Someone had to do something about this. Congress or John Gotti or the Virgen of Guadalupe. Or the media before they all became fearful for their very lives, the way dissidents in Soviet Union lived. Or live. She had lost track of Soviet politics, er, Russian politics, but she was pretty sure it was just as bad under Putin as it had been in the Soviet Seventies. <br />
<br />
Carrie went to her closet and pulled out something heavy. She put it in a golf club bag and drove off. She drove for miles and miles and then she drove some more. Until she found herself half a continent away, pulling up alongside the house where the people stood night and day holding signs and chanting, some angrily, some hopeful, some with beads in their hands and others with clenched fists. She went some blocks away to park her trendy but old Nissan and struggled to take the bag out of the trunk. She went and joined a tour of the house that inspired so much protest. Naturally, she wouldn’t be able to get to the orange faced menace in chief, but if she could . . . “I’ll teach him some new golf swings,” she muttered under her breath.<br />
<br />
She very quickly broke away from the tour, just like they did on television shows. She didn’t think it would be so easy. But since he had dispatched every possible available police and army-related personnel to make sure that Canadians were not climbing the wall from Mexico or wherever, and since they didn’t really care about someone so . . . . so . . . orange, the Secret Service were nowhere to be found. She crept around, looking over her shoulder, and peeked inside rooms of the large white mansion. Eventually she stumbled into what looked like the control room of a tv show. There were monitors everywhere. The orange person was looking at himself in a full-length mirror saying things like “Mr. Lincoln, you’re fired.” Suddenly, he spun around and saw Carrie at the door. He was about to demand to know what she was doing there when she reached into the golf bag and took out an axe. <br />
<br />
The faithful civil servant that he was, the orange menace ran from the room. Surprised by her own strength, as well as the continuing lack of Secret Service, or anyone, for that matter, she swung the axe as she went down the hallway. Chopping at every door like Jack Nicholson meets Carrie Bradshaw, yelling “Where’s Donnie?” and checking herself in the glass. She chopped and chopped down all of the doors of the mansion that had seemed so large from the outside but now was growing ever smaller. She felt like Alice in Wonderland at some points, having eaten the mushroom or whatever it was and growing larger. But it truth, she was much more like her namesake, Carrie Nation, taking an axe to anything and everything that represented a threat to her freedom. Anything that made men drunk and a threat to her and her “fellow” women, whether it was Jack Daniels or their own sense of power and entitlement. She chopped and she swung and then she came to the Lincoln Bedroom. <br />
<br />
There was a white-haired man with a square face standing at the edge of the bed, where Donnie the Menace lay, stabbed through the heart, panting out his last words and pointing at the square-faced man. “Lock . . him . . . up.” Meanwhile, she couldn’t be sure, but Carrie thought she saw the square faced man making mental notes, measuring for drapes and carpet, a gray-haired transgendered Jacquelyn Kennedy.<br />
<br />
Then the square man spotted Carrie carrying the axe and a twinkle appeared in his eye. He lunged at Carrie, but she had already anticipated his move. They struggled for the axe. “Come on,” he screamed. “You know you wanted it.” As he reached down to try to grab her, saying “Donnie says you bitches like this” she reached for a can of mace and yelling at the nameless white-haired man she screamed “No means no!” With one quick movement, the axe fell on his neck. Repeatedly. The man’s square head kept talking for a few moments, calling her every vulgar name in the book, including the worst epithet he could think of. “FEMINIST!”<br />
<br />
Carrie felt briefly like panicking. It seemed the thing to do in this situation. But Carrie had watched a lot of SNAPPED in her day, and she wasn’t about to make any rookie mistakes that would cause her to get caught. She quickly hatched a plan to dismember both bodies and dispose of them in a way that would not be traced back to her. It wasn’t like anyone was really going to look that hard for her. It could have been any one of 62,523,126 or more people. She stopped briefly to imagine the huge parade that might be thrown for her. Maybe there would even be a worker’s holiday in her honor. Carrie SNAPPED! out of her daydream and methodically went back to work. When she was done, she took the golf bag with her (no time to be sloppy now) and slipped into the tour again, this time joining a different group of tourists. She smiled slyly when thought she saw one of them wriggle out of the tour group.<br />
<br />
When Carrie awoke, she heard the sound of workers with chain saws taking down old trees that had been blown down from last night’s windstorm. What a cliché. It was all a dream. Or maybe a tornado, like in the Wizard of Oz. And you were there, Ivanka. And you were there, Mike Pence. She grimaced. How stupid she had been. She looked under the bed and found her axe next to a bag of golf clubs that had been put there for some reason. Suddenly, she saw a large orange hairball drift across the room like a tumbleweed.<br />
<br />
She turned on the television and gasped.<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-39878762921860792652017-02-01T16:29:00.000-06:002017-02-01T17:09:02.492-06:00Merge So I am looking at some of my older poetry that I didn't really think was very good. And now I just don't know what to think one way or another.<br />
<br />
Tell me what you think of this one.<br />
<br />
<br />
Merge<br />
<br />
<br />
I fall in love with every poet I meet.<br />
I don't know how to say no<br />
when your words know me that way.<br />
I am set in motion<br />
by the strong legs your verses give me,<br />
on the feet of your iambs and trochees,<br />
like a music box ballerina wound up,<br />
involuntary,<br />
moving with no intent of my own.<br />
<br />
I do not know how to speak to you<br />
in your own language. I am<br />
a novice--I still pronounce all my syllables.<br />
But I listen, as if I could absorb<br />
each beat, each word<br />
--shed this body of matter and<br />
become a note, a timbre in your voice,<br />
enter into your song --<br />
as if knowing the made me someone other<br />
than who I was born as if<br />
through your words <br />
we could become one new<br />
person in our two separate bodies.<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-15754101297434376492017-01-01T18:45:00.001-06:002017-01-01T18:45:53.153-06:00Three Women Full Video<iframe width="459" height="344" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/YyMsaqQgAMo" frameborder="0" allowFullScreen=""></iframe>
Here is a video I did with two other artists at Patrick's Cabaret in Minneapolis in 2013.Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-42195457690066859752016-12-25T20:24:00.000-06:002016-12-25T20:24:57.066-06:00Ecriture Feminine and the Petit Mort of Writing <br />
Where one of my classmates was talking about dying little deaths, small deaths along the way of writing, this made me think of the petit mort, which is French for orgasm. And as I read Cixous and think about her ecstasy in writing, talking about the flesh at work in a labor of love, I think more and more about the petit mort as a form of women's writing . This is all over Cixous. Her writing is full of ecstatic phrases about what it is to write. She does not fear the death of the author, either actual or metaphorical. Nor does writing, for Cixous, promise immortality. It is an in the moment activity. In “The Author in Truth,” Cixous writes about “striking out for the unknown, to make our way in the dark. To see the world with the fingers: isn't this the act of writing par excellence? ” In her manifesto “Coming to Writing,” there are extended passages that are about losing yourself in mad love (amour fou, as Andre Breton wrote of), to writing, to a feminine writing. This is not a nihilistic death, as might be seen in Foucault or Barthes, but a joyous celebration of what it is to write. “The text, already the lover who savors the wait and the promise,” she explains in “The Author in Truth .” <br />
<br />
“Text: not a detour, but the flesh at work in a labor of love” . As if she were taking the death of the author literally, then, she says “in the beginning, there can be only dying, the abyss, the first laugh. ” In Cixous' definition of the text, I do not feel the need to repudiate stupid Derrida. I can accept that there is nothing outside of this text, this ecriture feminine in which all things live as long as they live. It is not a hedge against death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . nor <br />
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a headlong dive into death. <br />
. . . . . . . . . .It is not about immortality and “what survives.” <br />
. . . . . . . . Writing is its own joy, . . . . . . . its own reward . . . . .its own pleasure. <br />
. . . . . . . It is a petit mort that is meant to be shared. <br />
. . . . . . . . . . . . . It is a revolution in language that is meant to liberate. <br />
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . It is a private moment, expressivist and confessional. <br />
. . . . . . . It . . . . . . . . . is . . . . . . . . everything.<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-83924766631301920192016-12-23T00:06:00.000-06:002016-12-23T00:06:29.276-06:00Death of the Author: God and Mother, A Parable<br />
In the Judeo-Christian tradition, the text, the word, is sacred. We cannot seem to get out of the tradition. For all of their post-modernism and the agnosticism that frequently comes with that, Barthes (and Derrida) also come out of a French tradition which was very very Catholic. Thus, I am going to make the story of the death of the author, male and female, into a comparative parable. <br />
<br />
In Christianity, Jesus (the author) must die and be resurrected so that believers (readers) can have safe passage to heaven (the text). This is the male-centered conception of the author as the all-knowing keeper of the text and of meaning. And in fact, Barthes speaks of “the ‘message’ of the Author-God” and says that “to refuse to fix its meaning is, in the end, to refuse God and his hypostases – reason, science, law." <br />
<br />
Women, however, have historically had a different relationship to birth and death, with many medieval women dying in childbirth. In this model, the woman (author) dies so that her child (the reader) may be born, but that child will be orphaned, with no one to guide her through life (the text). There is a “death/not death,” a voluntary withdrawal that happens here that can be seen as Cixous’ metaphor for the author. Cixous also talks about the (female) author as continuing “to have what she has eternally, to not lose having, to be pregnant with having is . . . the text, already in the child, in the woman . . . ” The woman is birthing the text, bringing it into being, and like giving birth, some of herself with leave her along with the text. But that text will not necessitate a death for the author. If the reader is a co-creator in meaning, as with Barthes, the author-mother will do so in conjunction with, not opposed to, the reader and the text.<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-84478285341351447892016-12-20T00:00:00.000-06:002016-12-20T00:00:17.696-06:001984: Liberal Politics in a Post-Human WorldMany professionals in other fields feel that literature has much to teach us about ourselves and about the society we live in. In Black Sun, Lacanian psychotherapist and linguist Julia Kristeva utilizes literature by Gerard de Nerval, Dostoyevky, and Marguerite Duras, among others, to talk about female melancholia. Political writer and literary critic Irving Howe writes about Solzhenitsyn, Andre Malraux, and George Orwell to talk about politics and the novel. Philosopher Richard Rorty also discusses the writings of Orwell in addition to Proust and Nabokov as well as a number of literary theoreticians such as Derrida and Nietzsche. By looking at a writer like George Orwell through the eyes of Richard Rorty and Irving Howe, we can see just how necessary literature is in its ability to show us aspects of where our society and government may go if we are not careful. Orwell's 1984 is a cautionary tale about what it means to lose our humanity and how stripping away our language contributes to that loss of humanity. <br />
<br />
In the 18th and 19th centuries, books like Pamela by Samuel Richardson or Julie by Jean-Jacques Rousseau were said to strengthen our ability for truly inclusive democracy by teaching us to empathize with people different from us, in these cases, men empathizing with women. Literature has changed, however, in the 20th and 21st centuries. With mechanized warfare and now with technology that could not have even been imagined in earlier centuries, novels have changed to reflect a very different social reality. The early 20th century saw the perversion of the revolutions in Russia followed by what we now commonly refer to as the “horrors of World War II” and many writers in the post-war era were rightfully disheartened and cynical. Theodor Adorno asked if it was even possible, ethically, to write poetry after Auschwitz, saying ultimately that it was, indeed, barbaric that poetry was still necessary. Adorno says that suffering, “demands the continued existence of art while it prohibits it; it is now virtually in art alone that suffering can still find its own voice, consolation, without immediately being betrayed by it” (8). In the midst of all of these discussions about what had happened and what might happen, came George Orwell's most famous novels, Animal Farm and <br />
1984, a fable and a cautionary tale, both focused on democracy betrayed. <br />
<br />
One of the major aspects of democracy is the concept of the self. Literary and political critic Irving Howe wrote that ”the idea of a personal self, which for us has become an indispensable assumption of existence . . . [is] a cultural idea” (178). Growing as it did out of the liberal era, “it is susceptible to historical growth and decline and may also be susceptible to historical destruction” (178). Arthur Mizener describes <br />
<br />
Orwell himself as a result of the cultural/liberal idea(1) of the human, saying that Orwell represents <br />
<br />
“the great liberal tradition of western civilization at its best, the informed, sceptical [sic], compassionate mind, able to use the insights of any doctrine without fanaticism, completely unaffected by the lure of submission to cheap creeds . . .” (687)<br />
<br />
At least one strain of literature was emerging, that of science fiction and dystopian fiction, focusing not on the positive, on empathy for other humans as an important part of the democratic mindset. In dystopian novels the focus was on cautionary tales of ways that we might end up losing our selves and our humanity. Rorty further echoes this when he says that while Orwell “was not the first to suggest that small groups of criminals might get control of modern states and thanks to modern technology, stay in control forever” that he was the first to ask how intellectuals would deal with a situation where “it had become clear that liberal ideals had no relation to a possible human future”(171). Howe takes it a step further, saying that “Orwell is trying to present the kind of world in which individuality has become obsolete and personality a crime [emphasis mine]” (189). “The whole idea of the self as something precious and inviolable is a cultural idea and as we understand it, a product of the liberal era,” which presumably, in the world of 1984, is now over. <br />
<br />
Richard Rorty talks about Orwell as being “of his time” and in fact quotes Howe as well, saying that “Orwell is one of those writers 'who live most significantly for their own age'” (169). But ask anyone who has read 1984 for the first time, and they will tell you it is as true now as it was in 1948. 1984 was one of those novels on the cutting edge of what we now call “dystopian” literature, which abounds plentifully in science fiction. There are a number of novels that are not read much anymore except for their historical significance, but I think it is wrong to place 1984 among those just yet. And in fact, Rorty himself is quick to say that “his description of our political situation remains as useful as any we possess” (170). Rorty talks about Orwell's “earlier warnings against the greedy and stupid conservatives together with his warnings against the communist oligarchs” (170), but what makes 1984 such an enduring model is the stranglehold that both technology and language hold over our society now more than ever. We are closer to the Orwell's world with our 24/7 news media, with media outlets that cannot be trusted, and with advertising language that tells us what is hot is cold, what is up is down, ignorance is strength, war is peace, freedom is slavery. <br />
<br />
Orwell's “Politics and the English Language” is frequently seen as the essay in which Orwell was working on a theory of language that would influence, if not become, Newspeak in 1984 . Philip Rahv says that “Newspeak is nothing less than a plot against human consciousness . . . to reduce the range of thought through the destruction of words” (182). In “Politics and the English Language” Orwell talks about the way the language becomes dull and flat and in doing so, makes us not only duller and flatter ourselves, but makes us indifference to the actual perversion of language. This is a form of contracting the language, as in Newspeak, and limiting our own range of language and therefore thought. He writes, for example, about dead metaphors that cease to have any meaning, pretentious diction, abstract words, which he calls meaningless words, like democracy, patriotic, realistic, justice. These are words that have no objective referent (146). Orwell is against what he calls “ready-made phrases” (147) suggesting instead that an ethical writer will ask himself “is this image fresh enough to have an effect” (148). If it can't have an effect, it can't produce thought in either the writer or the reader. Orwell then uses these examples to talk specifically about political speech, saying, for example, that “a comfortable English professor defending Russian totalitarianism cannot say outright ‘I believe in killing off your opponents when you can get good results in doing so.’” He must instead say:<br />
<br />
While freely conceding that the soviet regime exhibits certain features with the humanitarian may be inclined to deport, we must, I think, agree that a certain curtailment of the right to political opposition is an unavaoidable concomitant of transnational periods and . . . “ <br />
<br />
By inuring ourselves to ugly language that says nothing, we will be that much desensitized to ugly convoluted language that actually says horrible things, justifies cruelty. Collateral damage and acceptable losses come to mind. <br />
<br />
George Kateb describes the way in which all of this can be rationalized in the name of group identity (8), which in 1984 must be preserved at all costs. “The group is a we [emphasis his]” Kateb says, “an incorporated self that is oneself enlarged to include everyone else or that is oneself and everyone else diminished” (8). We can think, here, of the “two-minute hate” that occurs everyday in Oceania against one of the other two countries in the world of 1984. It doesn't matter which country they are currently fighting against and thus currently hating. What is important is to maintain the group identity by having an enemy to hate. Kateb talks about “the preservation of group identity through group pride and xenophobia” (8). Kateb is concerned with morality and the world of 1984 is decidedly immoral. Rahv reminds us that “‘Doublethink’ is drilled into the Party members, which consists of the willingness to assert that black is white when the Party demands it and een to believe that black is white, while at the same time knowing very well that nothing of the sort can be true” (182). Few of the workers in 1984 have the conscience or consciousness, let alone the language, to express any kind of disagreement with the official policies that they live under. Kateb tells us that “aesthetic motives help to animate the pursuit of ideals . . . that are loved more than morality of are so loved that the moral const does not break into consciousness with any force” (11). The “two minutes hate” is an aesthetic practice that leads to group identity, much like cheerleading to urge on your team. To challenge the “two minutes hate” would not only damage moral, but would also constitute a thoughtcrime. As Rahv says, the goal of restricting language is make “thoughtcrime literally impossible because there will be no words in which to express it” (qtd in Rahv, 182). It is literally unthinkable.<br />
<br />
Rorty further echoes this when he says that while Orwell “was not the first to suggest that small groups of criminals might get control of modern states and thanks to modern technology, stay in control forever” that he was the first to ask how intellectuals would deal with a situation where “it had become clear that liberal ideals had no relation to a possible human future”(171). Howe takes it a step further, saying that “ Orwell is trying to present the kind of world in which individuality has become obsolete and personality a crime [emphasis mine]” (189). “The whole idea of the self as something precious and inviolable is a cultural idea and as we understand it, a product of the liberal era,” which presumably, in the world of 1984, is now over.<br />
<br />
So what role does the novel have to play if we are indeed at the end of a liberal era where we are not talking about the individual self anymore, but instead are talking about being “post-human?” Does being post-human mean that we have lost empathy, lost our humanity? In “History as Nightmare,” Irving Howe talks about the way that “Orwell has imagined a world in which the self . . . is no longer a significant value, not even a value to be violated.” Like 18th century novels, Rorty contends that Orwell, among other things, means to create or at least remind us of, our humanity, of our ability to empathize with others. <br />
<br />
Works Cited<br />
Adorno, Theodor. “On Commitment.” Trans. Francis McDonagh. Acessed April 10, 2009.<br />
Howe, Irving. “The Fiction of Anti-Utopia,” The Orwell Reader: Text, Sources, Criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1963.<br />
Howe, Irving. “Orwell: History as Nightmare.” The Orwell Reader: Text, Sources, Criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1963.<br />
Kateb, George. “Aestheticism and Morality: Their Cooperation and Hostility,” Political Theory, vol 28, no 1, Feb. 2000, pp. 5-37. <br />
Kristeva, Julia. Black Sun: Depression and Melancholia. New York: Columbia University Press,1989. <br />
Mizener, Arthur. “Truth Maybe, Not Fiction.” The Kenyon Review, vol. 11, no. 4, 1949, pp. 685–688. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4333102. <br />
Orwell, George. 1984. The Orwell Reader: Text, Sources, Criticism. Ed. Irving Howe. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1963.<br />
Orwell, George. “Politics and the English Language,” The Orwell Reader: Text, Sources, Criticism. Ed. Irving Howe. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1963.<br />
Rahv, Philip. “The Un-future of Utopia,” The Orwell Reader: Text, Sources, Criticism. Ed. Irving Howe. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1963.<br />
Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony, Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.<br />
<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-84332692013836408332016-12-18T22:55:00.000-06:002016-12-18T22:55:37.359-06:00Mallarme I?In the end, much of the avant-garde comes back to Mallarme. Every book I read, whether by Breton in the 1920s or from a contemporary writer like Barrett Watten, James Harding, or Anna Lovatt, they all mention Mallarme. “Crisis in Poetry,” starts off by saying that as a reader, Mallarme had “the feeling of having read it all twenty years ago”1 I think of Eugene Ionesco who said in an interview that he started writing plays because he found the theatre to be so stale. He started writing plays that he himself would want to see.<br />
<br />
"I still could not see quite how to get rid of that positive feeling of malaise produce by my awareness of the “impurity” of acted drama. I was by no means an agreeable theatregoer, but on the contrary, sulky, grumbling, always discontented. Was this due to some deficiency in myself alone? Or was it something lacking in the theatre?"<br />
<br />
In a similar way, Mallarme speaks of poetry that is “extinct, or rather worn threadbare by repetition”3 because it is not of its time, tries too hard to imitate 17th century French poetry. I, too, started writing avant-garde poetry because it all had that “been there, done that, feeling.” Dada and Surrealism were like a breath of fresh air to my 21 year-old mind and have captivated me every since. Since I can't really get out of meaning though, try as I may, I keep collections of words and images that I occasionally go through. I pull out phrases that feel like they go together. In this way, I avoid writing about one specific thing, because when I try to write about something in particular, the poems suck. They are terrible, as are most poems that try to be about something4. Rather than trying to write about things, I try to write avant-gardely. Because the avant-garde in poetry, theatre, and art makes me happy. I like art that I don't understand, that I don't get on a conscious level, that I either have to work for or just let my mind go and appreciate the disparate images.<br />
<br />
This often gets me in trouble with academic writing, because I have a high threshold for writing that I don't understand. I don't get hung up on meaning.Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-7106258400496544392016-12-11T18:30:00.002-06:002016-12-11T18:48:18.132-06:00Thought Language Language Thought Thought Thought Language Language Thought WritingWeek 11 - Language and Writing <br />
<br />
<br />
It is impossible, or nearly impossible, for me at least, to talk about writing without talking about language. The two for me go hand-in-hand. I think of language as the atoms of writing. <br />
<br />
<br />
After at least a century of searching actively for a revolutionary function of poetry, (why) have we given up? (why) have we abandoned the incomplete experiments of the past? Where and how can poetry function uniquely, in other words, what are the unique functions of poetry, as a revolutionary practice? I prefer instead to think of the avant garde as the “first wave,” the ground work of consciousness, preparing the field. The change of consciousness, overused and virtually emptied of meaning as that idea may have become, is what necessarily must predate genuine social change. It is not up to poets (or even activists, politicians or “leaders”) to proscribe where that change needs to go, but to empower the imaginations around us to imagine something new, to dream our way out of the current world, which works only for a very few people. <br />
<br />
<br />
To restructure language is to restructure thought, to restructure possibilities. To scramble, if not permanently, which is impractical and will not lead to the world we want, but temporarily, the world as we (think) we know it, the language that binds us to the now, to put new ideas, new juxtapositions into play, new planets into orbit. This is the revolutionary work of the poet.<br />
<br />
<br />
To. . . . . remake . . . . . language. . . . . to . . . . find. . . . . .new<br />
. .. .creative . . . . .imagistic . . . . .practices . . . . . of language<br />
. . . . is to make . . . . . .resistance . . . possible . . . . . . to move us<br />
. . . . . . toward our vision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to have visions<br />
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . never . . . before . . . . possible<br />
<br />
<br />
I am talking here about a language that speaks outside of the dominant discourse, whether racialized, patriarchal, class-based, etc., an un-discourses or non-discourse, a paradiscourse, that brings with it the chance to step outside, run alongside, that does not attempt to use the tools of power that already exist, but to forge new tools that could create new structures, new edifices not previously imagined. The techne, the tool, in many ways prescribes what can be built. We know that with new technology new ways of thinking emerge. So why would we not want new mental and imaginative linguistic tools of our own? As Sol Lewitt says, “rational thoughts repeat rational thoughts.” The way we think perpetuates itself, we continue to think only in the ways we've always thought. I'm not looking then for a feminine language per se, except insofar as it might offer a resistive language, a paralanguage that we can frolic in and search for something unknown, a Dada language a non-sense that leads to sense a zaum a de-formed formalism that will birth new forms. <br />
<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-29764724981828083772016-12-06T16:48:00.000-06:002016-12-06T16:48:00.185-06:00Conceptualism and the Politics of the Art Object<br />
“The editor has written me that he is in favor of avoiding ‘the notion that the artist is a kind of ape that has to be explained by the civilized critic.’ This should be great news to both artists and apes.”<br />
<br />
--Sol LeWitt, “Paragraphs on Conceptual Art”<br />
<br />
<br />
As we move through the art of the 20th century (and beyond), from Dada forward, we move increasingly toward the dematerialization of the art object—from breaking apart the object in Cubism, to abstracting it in Abstract Expressionism, to eliminating it as a criteria altogether in movements such as Fluxus, which favored experience over the sacredness of the object, and Conceptual Art, which favored the idea of the object over its actual execution of lack of. <br />
<br />
As with many “movements” within art, there is some contestation around Conceptual Art, including its origins and its time lines. Charles Harrison, former editor of Art-Language places Conceptual Art within a very specific time frame of 1967-1972, during which time he sees the existence of a “critically significant conceptual art movement.” (29) A 1998 exhibit, Global Conceptualism: Points of Origin, organized by the Queens Museum of Art, placed the movement globally within a much broader frame from the late 1950s into the present day. Likewise, Harrison traces the inception of Conceptual Art back to minimalism, with its anti-formal tendencies, a claim that Sol LeWitt, in his “Paragraphs on Conceptual Art” denies by saying that no one he knows will admit to being a minimalist.<br />
<br />
Dick Higgins’ “Intermedia Chart” is a useful reference, because it shows a number of contemporary cointerminous art movements and the way in which they intersect with one another. In it, we see Conceptual Art linked with both Fluxus and Happenings, and indeed, a number of artists’ work did fall into both Fluxus and Conceptual art, most notably Yoko Ono, whose performance pieces such as “Cut Piece” and “Piece to Hammer a Nail” emphasize the interactive, experiential nature of the work to the audience, whereas works such as the “War is Over! (if you want it)” billboards and Grapefruit fall into the realm of Conceptualism. In fact, I would alter Higgins’ chart to bring concrete poetry, visual novels, etc. closer to Conceptual Art in the matrix. <br />
<br />
Without getting too bogged down in debates over origins and timeline, however, we can look at the tendencies that define historical and contemporary Conceptual Art, particularly as set forth by LeWitt himself in his “sentences” and “paragraphs” on Conceptual Art as well as looking at some of the politics of the dematerialization of the art object itself. <br />
<br />
At its most basic, Conceptual Art privileges the idea over the object. In fact, according to LeWitt, whether the object is actually ever created or not is incidental. Point 10 of “Sentences on Conceptual Art” asserts that “Ideas can be works of art; they are in a chain of development that may eventually find some form. All ideas need not be made physical.” While talking about an art made of ideas and language may at first blush sound very cerebral and based in logic, “LeWitt is quick to emphasize the intuitive nature of Conceptual Art and desire to work against “rational art.” The logical exists only to be subverted. <br />
<br />
“Logic may be used to camouflage the real intent of the artist, to lull the viewer into the belief that he understands the work, or to infer a paradoxical situation, such as logic vs. illogic.” <br />
<br />
While there are many examples of objects created by Conceptual artists, including the prolific LeWitt himself, pieces that have come to be known as “instruction pieces” such as Yoko Ono’s Grapefruit, or text pieces with few, if any, visual elements that we have come to associate with “art” are what we generally reference when talking about Conceptual Art. In fact, textuality plays a major role in Conceptualism, both in the art works and in the works of the artist. At the most basic level, <br />
Conceptual Art works have a tendency to be include text. “Since no form is intrinsically superior to another, the artist may use an form, from an expression of works (written or spoken) to physical reality, equally.” (Sentence #15). “If words are used, and they proceed from ideas about art, then they are art and not literature; numbers are not mathematics.” <br />
<br />
Harrison calls Conceptualism a movement of “artists who write” and there is a strong anti-critic streak within the movement. Even though LeWitt acknowledges that the artist may or may not fully understand his or her own work, LeWitt also criticizes the “secret language of the critic” [13]. By conceptualizing the art from the outset, the artist becomes a sort of self-critic, eliminating the critic as mediator between the audience and the art. Writing about the art was as important as creating it and vehicles such as Art News, where Lewitt’s sentences and paragraphs were first published, as well as Art-Language, offered forums for conceptual artists to show themselves as critics. Even using a format such as sentences and paragraphs which sets up a grammatical, language-based approach, rather than invoking the form of the manifesto, which previous avant-garde movements relied upon, shows a break with past ideas of art objects as separate from language. <br />
Conceptual Art reacted against Abstract Expressionism as not pushing art far enough away from the object, still privileging the art object as self-contained and as more concerned with its internal relationships than with the object’s relationship within the world. Abstraction, then, questions the image, but not the architecture of positions or the social relationship of the object. (Harrison, 31) Seeing painting, sculpture and traditional art forms as rigid and hegemonic, signs of an imperialist culture (41), Conceptual Art, as a movement of opposition, was self-conscious about its position among historical avant garde revolutions. Moreover, according to Harrison, the artists were not so much concerned with overthrowing, but to “reformulate and revalue modernism so as to validate their own enterprise as artistic . . . . clear[ing] a space for themselves to work.” (42) In fact, he contends that modernism needed to be current in order for the Conceptualists to establish themselves as avant garde. (42)<br />
<br />
It is on this critique of the art object and of the architecture it inhabits that I would like to linger and focus for the remainder of this piece. Among the hegemonic institutions that Conceptualism was reacting to was the art museum itself. I’d like to go out on a limb and borrow from Peggy Phelan’s ideas about the politics of representation to talk about the politics of the art object and of removing the object from the gaze of both spectator and critic. <br />
<br />
LeWitt distinguishes, first of all, between perceptual art, being art for the eye, and conceptual art, in which the concept is the most important aspect. Art that exists for the eye alone is subject to “the gaze”. Harrison describes the art object as “something contained within the ambient space of the stationary spectators gaze, its means restricted to whatever that gaze could pick out and animate.” In Unmarked, Peggy Phelan describes “the institional effect of the gallery” as putting the art object “under house arrest, controlling all conflicting and unprofessional commentary about it.” In this way, the gallery is able to maintain a degree of critical control over the work, and through controlling the placement and architecture of the piece, directing the gaze in certain ways.<br />
<br />
In discussing art and representation within a feminist frame, Phelan suggests that “it can be effective to politically and aesthetically deny representing the female body imagistically, psychically, to bring about a new form of representation itself.” (164) 1 I contend that we can substitute the art object for the “female body” as a way of looking at the art object in this context of politics and representation.<br />
<br />
Phelan draws a link between the gaze and commodification, and here, there can be no denying that Conceptual artists, concurrently with artists in Fluxus and other parallel movements, were indeed reacting against commodification of their work, and consequently, I would argue, against the gaze of institutions that wield power. As we can see in current political conditions, art is frequently on the front lines of political battles, either standing with or in opposition to, powerful institutions. Phelan describes an aesthetics of representation as offering a “pleasure of semblance and repetition [that] produces both psychic assurance and political fetishization.” (3) She further describes visibility politics as “compatible with capitalisms relentless appetite for new markets . . . The production and representation of visibility are part of the labor of the reproduction of capitalism.” (1) <br />
<br />
Harrison talks in a parallel way about beholding as problematized by Conceptual Art. Specifically, how is the “beholder” qualified to view and judge the art object, to what end does “beholding” lead, and under what conditions is it taking place? (33) This gets to the heart of the gallery/critic system, in which experts decide the architecture and placement of the work as well as its aesthetic and critical interpretation. Indeed, this is what situates the gallery as a hegemonic, anti-democratic institution from which art had to be freed.<br />
<br />
By emphasizing the idea of the object as primary over its execution, Conceptual artists bring into question the “value” of every piece of art that hangs in a gallery or museum. Sometimes refusing to create objects at all, they then sidestep the commodification of their ideas and their creativity. Some artists set up tables and sold small items themselves, including “selling” intangible objects or concepts for whatever their “buyers” were willing to pay for them (Camnitzer) and in the process, democratizing and subverting the system of selling art altogether.<br />
<br />
Of course, it is the nature of the capitalist gaze to create commodities, which fits hand in hand with the nature of artists and their movements to want to be remembered. Consequently, Conceptual Art has not been able to completely escape the traps of representation. While they may have initially confounded the gallery system, the writings of many original Conceptual Artists and the textual nature of the work lend themselves to book publishing, and what objects do remain from previous moments of Conceptual Art now find their way into museums and traveling exhibitions. This is a tension that the avant garde has not been able to free itself from completely as it moves from present moment to retrospective. Nonetheless, Conceptualism has provided the opportunity for visual artists to challenge the very bases of their work: both the gaze of the spectator and critic, and the gallery system in which they encounter the art object. In its current practice, Conceptualism remains an art form that through its use of text and idea, lends itself easily to political and activist contexts and in doing so, continues to struggle with and confront these very issues.<br />
. <br />
<br />
1 While I don’t know that I am willing to argue that the art object itself is inherently female at this point, it cannot be denied that the subject of many masterpieces has in fact, been the feminine form. Thus the art object in those cases becomes directly implicit in the relationship of the gaze to the female body. And in fact, a number of feminist artists have turned to Conceptual art to produce works that confronted the male gaze outright. See Camnitzer et al.<br />
<br />
Bibliography<br />
<br />
Alberro, Alexander, and Blake Stimson. Conceptual art : a critical anthology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1999.<br />
Camnitzer, Luis, Jane Farver, Rachel Weiss, László Beke, Queens Museum of Art, Walker Art Center, and Miami Art Museum of Dade County. Global conceptualism : points of origin, 1950s-1980s / foreword by Luis Camnitzer, Jane Farver, Rachel Weiss ; introduction by Stephen Bann ; essays by László Beke .. New York: Queens Museum of Art : Available through D.A.P./Distributed Art Publishers, 1999.<br />
Harrison, Charles. Essays on Art & language. Oxford [England] ; Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell, 1991.<br />
Higgins, Hannah. Fluxus experience. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.<br />
LeWitt, Sol. “Sentences on Conceptualism.” http://www.altx.com/vizarts/conceptual.html, Referenced February 25, 2004.<br />
Munroe, Alexandra, Yoko Ono, Jon Hendricks, and Bruce Altshuler. Yes Yoko Ono / Alexandra Munroe with Jon Hendricks ; with essays by David A. Ross, Murray Sayle, Jann S. Wenner ; contributions by Bruce Altshuler .. New York: Japan Society ; Harry N. Abrams, 2000.<br />
Phelan, Peggy. Unmarked : the politics of performance. London ; New York: Routledge, 1993.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Appendix 1: Intermedia Chart <br />
Appendix 2: Sentences on Conceptual Art<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-70236824567367040032016-12-03T11:52:00.000-06:002016-12-03T11:52:47.776-06:00Gender and Genre ContinuedI have journals due in one of my current MA classes, but the instructor is only going to glance at them. I have done all of this work for very little return. I know, a journal is often written only for oneself, but I also wrote it as a conversation with the instructor which now will not happen. So as to make this a more fruitful endeavor, I am going to post some of the journals here. Enjoy and feel free to respond so as to make these truly a conversation.<br />
________________________________________________________<br />
<br />
I got this article out of a book called Feminist Theory and Folklore, and so it is, indeed, about both of those subjects, but again, any kind of feminist approach to academia must also, or should also, in my mind, deal with boundary crossing. Right away on the first page of the article she talks “how people negotiate the categories that are imposed upon them” (71). Many of the restrictions of academic writing predate women’s mass entrance into the academy and represent patriarchal categories of what “counts” as academic writing, what “counts” as academic publishing, etc. I have underlined at least half of the first page because it says so much that I have come to love and agree with. <br />
<br />
“Theories of gender and genre converge in their exploration of the problems of classification and the disruption of boundaries. Genre is often (emphasis mine) gendered . . . . Gender scholarship questions how cultural categories are reproduced and under what conditions women are complicit with or resistant to the reproduction of conventions.”<br />
<br />
Schuman continues, talking about the way that “genre classification systems could represent the values of a culture” (72), and the way that “genre systems are as much about disputes, maintenance, and shifting of boundaries” (73). Thus, it is no wonder that feminists coming to academic would question those kinds of boundaries. Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-32017748757284518532016-12-01T13:04:00.000-06:002016-12-01T13:04:01.746-06:00Martha Nussbaum: Poetic JusticeI have journals due in one of my current MA classes, but the instructor is only going to glance at them. I have done all of this work for very little return. I know, a journal is often written only for oneself, but I also wrote it as a conversation with the instructor which now will not happen. So as to make this a more fruitful endeavor, I am going to post some of the journals here. Enjoy and feel free to respond so as to make these truly a conversation.<br />
____________________________________<br />
<br />
<br />
I am reading an excerpt from a book for one of my classes by Martha Nussbaum. The book is Poetic Justice and the chapter is on the literary imagination. I am reading about the mistrust of literature as subversive by people who are only interested in economics and science and my mind started to wander. (This is actually why it takes me so long to read a book anymore, because for every 250 words I read I write 500). Is there really any way for human beings to get away from purpose? Do we automatically ascribe purpose to every single thing we do, even writing literature? Is there really such a thing as purposeless human activity and what is it in our drive to make meaning that even after the fact, even when we might have thought we had done something purposeless, that we have to assign a purpose to it. I like to think that some writing is just an end in itself, but other times, if I am challenged and on the defensive about “what use is poetry” which I think was originally proposed by Amiri Baraka but I know from my friend in Minneapolis, performance poetry J. Otis Powell! as he used to stand up in front of a 3-piece jazz combo and declaim and question it, I can always assign a purpose to poetry, even avant-garde Dadaistic poetry. <br />
<br />
And since we are talking about purpose, I can bring this all the way back around to my BIG paper for this class. The point of my thesis is that Dadaistic avant-garde poetry can liberate the imagination and get us out the quagmire of thought that we find ourselves in and that in this day and age, relevant to Derrida’s law of genre, poetry is in the unique position not to have to be linear anymore the way it was in Aristotle’s day, when it was the only literary game in town. Now poetry can be pure flights of fancy, which is not to say that it is purposeless. Quite the contrary, is the argument that I would make.<br />
<br />
And I notice that I start all of my sentences, my paragraphs, or at least most of them, with conjunctions, which is actually how I write when I am free associating, like I do in journals. And I start thinking again about my paper and what purpose I want it to serve, if I want it to be an exploration of something I haven’t explored enough of, like Helene Cixous, if I want it to be about someone that I have studied before and develop expertise on, like Shelley Jackson, or if I want it to be “in service to” my thesis. And so I have written or argued myself right back where I started.<br />
<br />
But, I could add, at least having put it down on paper, it is in my mind now and I can start trying to narrow it down somewhat. Thus, I have accomplished something “of purpose” with these ramblings.<br />
<br />
Better luck next time.<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-11346662911526675962016-11-28T17:01:00.000-06:002016-11-28T17:01:47.204-06:00Amy Shuman: Gender and GenreI have journals due in one of my current MA classes, but the instructor is only going to glance at them. I have done all of this work for very little return. I know, a journal is often written only for oneself, but I also wrote it as a conversation with the instructor which now will not happen. So as to make this a more fruitful endeavor, I am going to post some of the journals here. Enjoy and feel free to respond so as to make these truly a conversation.<br />
____________________________________<br />
<br />
I remember working with Amy Shuman's essay “Gender and Genre,” which I had wanted to revisit but for the life of me, I can't find that ONE course reader I had from NYU that has it in there. I even know which course reader it was and what color it is, but it must still be packed away. So, I found the article and have ordered the book from Amazon and I will write about it more extensively within the next two weeks. What I do recall is that it was a response to Derrida's “Law of Genre” and that it influenced what I had talked about in my presentation. Again, we talked a LOT about feminism and women's words when I was at NYU. And it now occurs to me that there are a lot of women in English studies, both at WIU and in general. <br />
<br />
Richard Schechner, one of my professors at NYU asked a question about the relationship of gender to teaching and he said that it has traditionally been a women's position and that was why it paid so low. I held, and I still do, that it has not traditionally been women's work – but I think that we w ere arguing two different things. I believe that he was thinking about the education of young children, which for the last 150 years or so has been done by women. I am thinking of university educations which women have only been accepted into relatively recently and in greater numbers within the past 40 or so years. But thinking about the “demise of the humanities,” this has been an area that women have been drawn to and so it shouldn't come as a surprise at all that now that women have rushed to the academy to join the ranks of the humanities, that people now think the humanities don't matter and that they should be defunded. But they can't close ranks forever. As they defund the humanities, or at least try to do so, more women will enter the sciences and other fields that have also traditionally been male-dominated, and there will be no place for the patriarchally-minded among us to go where there are no women, unless we have something like a Margaret Atwood Handmaid's Tale kind of reversal of society, which is not as improbable as it seems, given what happened in Germany between the Weimar and the Nazis, wherein there was a political rejection of the open climate of the Weimar.<br />
<br />
All of this, again, brings me back to “Gender and Genre,” about a possible “rejection” or at least radical rethinking of academic work and what it means to be academic, what it means for women who have traditionally done “expressive” writing – short stories and fiction, storytelling, to rehink and remake what constitutes academic writing. Is it necessarily less rigorous? What potential do we have to remake academic writing and not have it devalued, like so many things in culture become once they are associated with women and with women's work? Is rigor always to be male-defined or adhered to by male academic standards that we had no role in setting, but must uphold and maintain? And if we choose to change those standards or to not uphold and maintain those standards any more, will our own work be less valid? What would the new standards look like?<br />
<br />
And now I am thinking about Rebekah Buchan's class on digital humanities, and she talked about work that was being published online for critiques to happen online. I can't remember now if it was said that the work was never really considered finished, but I tend to think not. And that's what I tell students who come to the writing center, and that's what I even tell my students in class – that no piece of writing is ever really finished, but that at some point you have to finish your writing of it and turn it in for the time being. Although I know that I certainly go back to my writing all the time and borrow from it, revise it, rewrite it, and whatever else there is to “redo” from it. The internet and the digitization of literature is changing everything. I put a lot of my work out on Academia.com and in some cases, that might disqualify it for publication in scholarly journals or at least will mean that I might have to “cheat” and pull my work down from site like that in order to get it published by a journal that “counts” as academic and rigorous in the eyes of academia. There is a lot of talk, and always has been, among creative writers who are academics, because it is possible to amass a whole lot of writing credits that are not “acceptable” to the university because they are not peer-reviewed journals. This is especially true for experimental or avant-garde writers. <br />
<br />
Despite all the talk about interdisciplinary work being the rage, the future of academia, that is also not true. Disciplines are still very much in place and defending their turf. <br />
<br />
So, I ask you, what is a genre-jumper, an academic/non-academic, someone for whom writing is both a social and an anti-social act, to do?<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-87832678476684982192016-11-26T21:52:00.000-06:002016-11-26T21:52:04.537-06:00Cross-Genre Writing and In-Class Performance/PresentationI have journals due in one of my current MA classes, but the instructor is only going to glance at them. I have done all of this work for very little return. I know, a journal is often written only for oneself, but I also wrote it as a conversation with the instructor which now will not happen. So as to make this a more fruitful endeavor, I am going to post some of the journals here. Enjoy and feel free to respond so as to make these truly a conversation.<br />
____________________________________<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>Women Writing Culture</i> was a book used in my feminist ethnography class at NYU. That was a very important book because it showed examples of women writing ethnography as stories, plays, and poems. It talked about the fact that often male anthropologists were off talking to the men of a community who gave the “official” story of their tribe, village, or group while their wives were talking to the women, getting information on their day-to-day lives and writing it up as short stories. At NYU, we were actively encouraged to play around with genres and in fact, my department chair gave a reading of sonnets that she had written in response to Barthes’ A Lover’s Discourse. It always disappointments me when I am in a program that discourages such experimentation and that is why I wanted to take that freedom when it was offered in this class. <br />
<br />
I was using the poetic technique, which I have often seen in prose as well, of numbering items to make it cohere, turning back on itself, without having to have formal transition. Because I had a limited amount of time, and because I was working with disparate theories and incidents that would all come back around to the main point, I decided on that format. It was a very conscious decision once I wrote my initial text.<br />
<br />
My reading of the text was a performance in itself, meant to be like a lecture. When I directed a play at Scott Community College, a version of Antigone that I had put together myself from Sophocles, Georges Bataille, and Kurt Schwitters, I had the academic chorus instead of a Greek chorus, reciting lines from Judith Butler’s Antigone’s Claim¸ asking how psychoanalysis would be different today if Freud had started with Antigone rather than Oedipus. Drawing from that experience and the “performance of academia,” that is why I decided to stand up and read the text. Also, as I write this, I think about how much academic work was not necessarily published as a text initially, but as a speech, a class, conference proceedings, etc., including Saussure’s Course In General Linguistics, much, if not all of Lacan’s various Seminars, Derrida’s “Law of Genre,” etc.<br />
<br />
I really took umbrage at the comment, made later, that my presentation was personal expression, but by then we had moved on and I didn’t feel like bringing the conversation back to my “lecture.” I do, however, want to defend it. I dislike most poetry that is solipsistic, that deals purely with the feelings of the author and nothing else, and I also dislike teaching theories that focus only on interiority and self-expression. As Kirsten and I were saying, we have a student who comes into the writing center who was obviously taught using those kinds of theories in the 1970s and thinks that writing is only about his impressions and ideas, and we are having a hard time getting him to see that yes, it is that, but it is also much more than that, especially at the graduate level. So that kind of “self-expression” talk tends to really push my buttons.<br />
<br />
While my presentation had much of me in it, and much creativity, I also had a lot of research and a lot of other people’s ideas. I cited Barthes, Foucault, Cixous, and Derrida as well as some lesser-known theories. I also cited primary research I have been doing for several years into different ways that we can help students by not only giving them alternative assignments, but alternative ways to complete those assignments, like my spontaneous research. Surrealism is very interested in consciousness and in unconscious processes. That is why the Surrealists were so interested in Freud and so disappointed when he did not reciprocate their feelings. I believe such concerns are very neglected in educated students and I look to my own levels of interest/disinterest, my own areas where I have divided attention and trouble getting my own work done to think about ways to help my students. Many people in graduate school are “model students.” That’s how we got this far. Most of us are teaching students who are not “model” student or who live in less-than-perfect situations that do not allow them to get their work done. So I ask myself how I can use my own barriers, my own divided attention, combined with my interest in creative writing and in surrealism, to help my students to get their work finished?<br />
I also disagree with the comments that genre is important because it helps us to know how to read a text. After I had thought about that for a while, I came to the conclusion that it is not genre that tells us how to read something, but it is the content itself. If the content is all focused on dog obedience, for example, you can use poems, stories, and research to explain dog obedience to a reader. And in this post-modern world, authors do that all the time! It seems to me that it is only in academic writing, not popular writing, that genre is insisted upon. Corporations use actors to help with their corporate training. They do use poetry and short stories to promote diversity. And three articles that I use in my English and speech classes talk about the value of storytelling to help people learn. Outside of academia, people push the boundaries all the time, using humor, poetry, and storytelling to train and get their points across.<br />
<br />
Partially, I take blame myself for people not “getting” what I was talking about. I feel that if you are going to do something that is unusual, you need to prepare people for it somewhat. When I do an avant garde performance at an open mic, for example, I will give the audience an instruction not to “overthink” the poetry and try to figure it out, but just to roll with the images. So in retrospect, I might have done this with my class presentation – given them a line or two of instructions. I guess I thought they would “get” what I was trying to do rather than being adversarial. That might also mean that I was attacking some very closely held beliefs that they have about genre.<br />
<br />
_________________________________________________<br />
<br />
Here is my class presentation:<br />
<br />
<i><b>One Day in the Life of French Theory<br />
Featuring non-French actors</b></i><br />
<br />
<b>Michel Foucault </b>is collecting objects and placing them – on the wall, on the table, etc., asking himself where these go in the oeuvre. Maybe picks things out of the trashbin of literary history.<br />
<br />
Voila! Stephen King’s Parking Tickets<br />
Voila! Nietzsche’s Laundry List<br />
Voila! Hemingway’s hunting license<br />
<br />
Takes a large stack of paper out of the trash and holds it up for the audience to see.<br />
<br />
Voila! Shakespeare’s supposed (typed) manuscript of his complete works<br />
<br />
He sits down at that point and starts going through it.<br />
<br />
<b>Barthes</b> enters the room.<br />
<br />
Barthes: L’auter est mort! Vive le lecteur!<br />
He looks through a book and then declaims/asks: Who is speaking?<br />
<br />
Foucault: What does it matter who is speaking!?<br />
<br />
Enter <b>Cixous</b>: <br />
<br />
Of course it matters, you patriarchal windbags. The author isn’t dead, She’s right here!” Mutters to herself: “Why is that men on the left cannot see their own blind spots? You go on all day about the oppressors and post-colonial this and post-structural that but then you deny us our voices when it suits you, when you don’t feel the need for an author.<br />
<br />
“Who makes me write, moan, sing, dance? Who gives me the body that is never afraid of fear? Who writes me? . . . When I have finished writing, when we have returned to the air of the song that we are, the body of texts that we will have made for ourselves will become one of its names among so many others. In the beginning, there can be only dying, the abyss, the first laugh” <br />
<br />
Foucault and Barthes either look up and listen, then all continue with what they are doing what in the background. Cixous begins reading her book (Coming to Read) semi-silently to herself while Barthes is flipping through his book (Image, Music, Text) occasionally muttering something out of it. All three fade off as Laura begins.<br />
<br />
<br />
Prelude:<br />
<br />
I. The Law of Genre, or Genre’s Genre<br />
<br />
Since the beginning of time, a student paper might read, since the invention of the alphabet, since humans began to carve sentences into stone, put ink to papyrus, they have questioned the nature of writing and of those who write – the author.<br />
<br />
I am always trying to subvert academic writing whenever I get the chance, to cross boundaries. To risk annihilation, to risk death. To risk, as Hamlet puts it, those thousand natural deaths that flesh is heir to.” As an author, one who lays her ego on the line to be examined, challenged, refuted, ‘tis a consummation I do NOT devoutly desire, but to which I subject myself, nonetheless.<br />
Derrida says I shouldn’t mix creative work with academic work. His “Law of Genre” states, “I will not mix genres. Genres are not to be mixed.” But Derrida is a postmodernist. Of course genres are to be mixed. Unless he is being ironic. Unless he is pulling our legs. Moreover, it is impossible to mix genres because ultimately the original genre becomes very pregnant, giving birth to a new genre. This is what happened when we mixed drama and poetry, poetry and storytelling, o or most recently, fiction and nonfiction. They resulted in the separate genres of poetry and drama, of poetry and fiction, of creative nonfiction. Perhaps that is the consequence that Derrida is talking about. It is not dangerous to mix genres at all, but very thrilling. But then Derrida goes on to talk about the genre of genre and all of my imaginative imaginings go out the window as I becoming once again confused and numb. So let us move on before we all succumb to that fate.<br />
<br />
II. The Death of the Author<br />
<br />
In thinking about the “Death of the Author,” I now see that death everywhere. I see it in all writings and I think about it in my own writing. What does it mean? I don’t take it as a literal death nor a hedge against death, although many have talked before about how at least as an author you have a chance to be remembered, to live on. But then I think about my own writing, and when I am done writing a piece, I can admire it, love it, cite it, quote it. Not, I think, out of a sense of narcissism, although that is always possible. But because I, as a writer, die when the piece is completed and I, as a reader, am born. <br />
<br />
Cheryl Walker says that Barthes’ “Death of the Author” seems more extreme than Foucault’s “The Author Function,” but I do not see it that way, because Barthes, as our textbook tells us, was caught in the shift from modernism, with its ideas of liberalism, to post-modernism. Thus, with the “Death of the Author” comes the birth of the reader, and that is certainly a way of democratizing reading, of taking it out of the hands of English departments and critics and those “in the know.” <br />
<br />
III. Dividing Attention<br />
<br />
There are also several points I want to make with this presentation. One thing that as a performer I am interested in is divided attention. What do we pay attention to and what falls out? What do we tune in and out of and what do we sacrifice by our choices? In today’s society, we are faced with this all the time, even as we read. I also want participation, which is akin to Barthes’ “Death of the Author.” The reader (audience) participates in making meaning (performing). It is not just a passive activity. It is never just a passive activity, a past-time, a pass-time. To read is to participate. To read out loud is to perform.<br />
<br />
IV. The Oeuvre<br />
<br />
Then there are the questions of what goes into the oeuvre, as Foucault asks, and for this occasion, I have written a poem, called Foucault’s Laundry List: (Clear throat)<br />
<br />
<i><br />
<b>Nietzsche’s Laundry List</i></b><br />
<br />
How am I to exist now that I am<br />
Alone in this world<br />
A character without an author<br />
Without a function I am adrift afloat<br />
No god to tell me what to do how<br />
Am I to distinguish from<br />
What is good and what is merely <br />
The Detritus of history?<br />
O, Pirandello, o Barthes and Foucault. Who<br />
Will lead me down the proper path, show me<br />
The way, teach me to distinguish between<br />
Hemingway’s hunting license or<br />
Stephen King’s parking tickets or<br />
Nietzche’s laundry list:<br />
Suit coat<br />
Dress pants<br />
Socks and garter<br />
Bear skin<br />
Tiger paws (with claws)<br />
Straight jacket<br />
Flattened bowler hat<br />
Paper pulled from pockets full of notes and numbers<br />
The stardust from infinite far away planets<br />
Oh, who will tell me what it all means<br />
And if it is collectible part of<br />
The canon.<br />
<br />
<br />
With the internet, we no longer have to make choices about what goes into an oeuvre. We can very well include Nietzsche’s laundry list to his oeuvre, his collected works. There are writers who have included only margin notes, without the original text. There are authors who create their work by blacking out part or most of the text. Andy Warhol used to buy things, towels and underwear and clothes, and send them straight to a storage unit to become a permanent part of his “collection.” The internet affords us the “space” to collect everything that might some day become useful to us.<br />
<br />
V. Ecriture Feminine<br />
<br />
I am also interested in feminine writing, which Cixous, as a “second-wave” surrealist (and there are 3rd wave surrealists too practicing right now), contends can be nonlinear and embodied. I want to show all of this even as I comment upon it. I want to make my academic work poetic, a performance, to make my teaching work surrealistic, to make my poetry and art academic. What does it mean for Cixous to talk about an embodied writing? There are people who practice what is called somatic writing, writing from the body. But I don’t really know what that is. But I have, with my illustration, the performance before my piece, to show, not tell, to have an embodiment of what Barthes, Foucault and Cixous are talking about when they talk about authors and functions and writing.<br />
<br />
VI. Surrealism and Teaching<br />
<br />
I have developed a series of writing assignments for my students that are inspired by surrealism. I have them do “chance operations” in organizing their work, randomly rearranging their paragraphs, which they are reluctant to do at first, many believing the way they have written their paper is the most logical way. This allows them to see other ways that they might have arranged their writing. I have often done this with my own academic writing and found it to work better myself. (I NEVER ask my students to do anything I haven’t done first. ) I have them do “spontaneous research” in which they dive right in to the middle of an article, randomly pick a paragraph, and write in response to that paragraph. I have them write with their eyes closed as a warm up, which they are also resistant to at first. However, as with Cixous’ feminine writing, ecriture feminine, I have noticed a gender gap, with female students being more open to this than my male students.<br />
As a teacher, I am reborn a reader once more.<br />
<br />
VII. Dare to Suck<br />
<br />
As one of my poetry colleagues used to say at the open mics in Minneapolis, you have to “dare to suck.” I am taking that challenge to heart. I know that all writing is rewriting, may be rewritten one day for a future audience, and so I have faith my oeuvre may contain my ecriture feminine, with all of its glorious mistakes and successes.<br />
<br />
I have embraced failure. This is either going to go magnificently or fall on its face. I am ok with either. I will lose a little sleep if it falls on its face, I will toss and turn for a night or two, feel foolish, and get on with my life.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-66099184476428959292016-11-25T17:18:00.002-06:002016-11-25T17:18:30.704-06:00Wolfgang Iser and Reader-Response TheoryI have journals due in one of my current MA classes, but the instructor is only going to glance at them. I have done all of this work for very little return. I know, a journal is often written only for oneself, but I also wrote it as a conversation with the instructor which now will not happen. So as to make this a more fruitful endeavor, I am going to post some of the journals here. Enjoy and feel free to respond so as to make these truly a conversation.<br />
____________________________________<br />
<br />
<br />
A brief story. I had a friend who wrote what I considered to be a brilliant poem. In it was the line “brown leaves change and paper.” I had always read that as brown leaves change into paper. He insists that it is just a list. Now, the claim could be made that with proper punctuation, this could be cleared up, like the Facebook memes that tell why grammar is important. (“Let’s eat, Grandma.” Vs. “Let’s eat Grandma.”) But in another way, this gets to reader-response theory. Most of us had only heard the poem as it was read at an open mic and so our interpretation was based on the words, not on the punctuation. The pauses were assumed to be dramatic pauses, not a sequential list. And I was not alone in how I had interpreted the poem. Many other people who talked to the poet said that they had assumed the same thing, but he insisted that it was just a list, as he had intended. <br />
<br />
As I read the introduction to Wolfgang Iser, I read the objections to his theory about the “dynamic interaction of text and reader” (1522). I am reading how some thought that his theory would destabilize the text and that “there might be an infinite number of possible readings for every text,” to which I have written “Horrors!” in the margin. Obviously, it depends on the text. If one is reading/writing a medical textbook, you do not want an infinite number of possible readings. You want only one. If you are reading “The Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock,” although TS Eliot might want you to “get” only his intent in writing the piece, it is possible and no less desirable, for every person to interpret the poem in an idiosyncratic way, unique to that individual. There is no harm to that, and you can even acknowledge that x is what Eliot intended, but c is the reading that you got from the text based on your gender, class, education, worldview, etc.Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-511060238726362052016-11-24T18:03:00.000-06:002016-11-24T18:03:42.232-06:00Smilefish: An Ekphrastic Exquiste Corpse from the Midwest Writing Center ConfereneSmilefish mama mother<br />
of all other fishes star<br />
fishes smiling whales and trouts<br />
or bass (I don't really know trout from bass<br />
but I don know whats and sharks and jel<br />
lyfish) she is mother of them <br />
all--even octopi. She smiles with her<br />
shades too cool for school-<br />
-s of fishes -- see what I did<br />
there? -- legs ready to evolve into<br />
animal mammal on land smilefish<br />
mother of us birthing fish<br />
and octopi and seals and otters and <br />
birthing us like Eve, Lilith, Mary, Kali<br />
(who destroys AND creates,<br />
eats her young), Mothers mamas<br />
of us all passing on smiles and <br />
shades and her lovely patterns for our<br />
clothes. We will all be striped like<br />
she is, one way or another, showing our <br />
stripes what we are made of our<br />
sharkskin feet and our scaley<br />
pants and our mohawk<br />
heads in punk rock defiance of<br />
species, of habitat. WE live<br />
anywhere we want and we<br />
smile like the motherfish.Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-69497782463508622992016-11-24T13:46:00.000-06:002016-11-24T13:46:12.343-06:00Resistance Poetry Wall - 100,000 Poets for Change100,000 Poets for Change, which sponsors an annual international day of poetry the last Saturday in September has opened up a Poetry Resistance Wall on their <a href="http://www.100tpcmedia.org/100TPC2012/2016/11/resistance-poetry-wall-100-thousand-poets-for-change-2017/">blog.</a> Please go there and check out the poetry and post some of your own. <br />
<br />
Here are some pictures from the Quad Cities' 100,000 Poets for Change events in 2014 and 2016.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhx7ZEMDIrDmSBVqkG4ZDAwxp200pGl1pHfu4XcL210ch0LGH0wTpujmmVHeS_KZGKAKBHq2otO_HKHwt-1fNUt7mmLFYPaUhcGwFjDQt1vshkJarenShBB0PCueH5_VlssYlHF/s1600/100K+Poets+for+Change+2014.jpeg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhx7ZEMDIrDmSBVqkG4ZDAwxp200pGl1pHfu4XcL210ch0LGH0wTpujmmVHeS_KZGKAKBHq2otO_HKHwt-1fNUt7mmLFYPaUhcGwFjDQt1vshkJarenShBB0PCueH5_VlssYlHF/s320/100K+Poets+for+Change+2014.jpeg" width="246" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzHF-oAn5gQAbam2O3h5FQ9h_kLqwVHKD6ehv7WavkSDp2BDCqTSrEInve3LOQO4VWRK9fuZq6GS-dTwOqi_2o-S1nC3t3embn2uREaFu3UEPa1hP5WUceXH9TnTnuuOIToiji/s1600/100K+Poets+for+Change+wide.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzHF-oAn5gQAbam2O3h5FQ9h_kLqwVHKD6ehv7WavkSDp2BDCqTSrEInve3LOQO4VWRK9fuZq6GS-dTwOqi_2o-S1nC3t3embn2uREaFu3UEPa1hP5WUceXH9TnTnuuOIToiji/s320/100K+Poets+for+Change+wide.jpg" width="320" height="247" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvrmv-BlqB997AsZWGeE1rXWkd4OKWLUqh167D9fPkZf27TKCy_G-WOOOGJ24J73WwPFyWCVKV47s_gUCmUrxqqvcCKA6x2sy6NmGMrdpwhA4ZM5KGm4VhwfkaRCyttj-jWyKj/s1600/Audience.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvrmv-BlqB997AsZWGeE1rXWkd4OKWLUqh167D9fPkZf27TKCy_G-WOOOGJ24J73WwPFyWCVKV47s_gUCmUrxqqvcCKA6x2sy6NmGMrdpwhA4ZM5KGm4VhwfkaRCyttj-jWyKj/s320/Audience.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKFEI2eq8H_CaBejYgSa1369AtNtCZl0iAt-Dhdp9SfOiTmW0T30ulhHivRxXa75HdltkePxRvc8eS1KJGaabnVl_SIfTYyz6rQlVv1rLYgxl5GsPY12jYO0pgkx-96crT6L6o/s1600/crowd.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKFEI2eq8H_CaBejYgSa1369AtNtCZl0iAt-Dhdp9SfOiTmW0T30ulhHivRxXa75HdltkePxRvc8eS1KJGaabnVl_SIfTYyz6rQlVv1rLYgxl5GsPY12jYO0pgkx-96crT6L6o/s320/crowd.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUeIqYN0bdpALd8pq5ULeqH2oxZyRK_bnXDpDkl9bi4jDRXu9BgW8JRac3TxyMR7rSPaJf6gbTdJcjfaFccNbYynH6i1HkKPDGZGwaT5RmJ5x5Frug-QdScQY6a_KCi0YbszYD/s1600/Jennifer+2.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUeIqYN0bdpALd8pq5ULeqH2oxZyRK_bnXDpDkl9bi4jDRXu9BgW8JRac3TxyMR7rSPaJf6gbTdJcjfaFccNbYynH6i1HkKPDGZGwaT5RmJ5x5Frug-QdScQY6a_KCi0YbszYD/s320/Jennifer+2.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHXJOU8nK34hQEskZiBhiBkyO2qapHDtjXDYKLAgfZPpkhoXqGsBp7muOUVNp9ZMlzpV6SfDmxDTTjDt_9bUQ6L30_fBt7D5_HmGBzPc5UQg4BOl-L2weEGWYnvRpf8qZwctuW/s1600/Jennifer+Jefferson.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHXJOU8nK34hQEskZiBhiBkyO2qapHDtjXDYKLAgfZPpkhoXqGsBp7muOUVNp9ZMlzpV6SfDmxDTTjDt_9bUQ6L30_fBt7D5_HmGBzPc5UQg4BOl-L2weEGWYnvRpf8qZwctuW/s320/Jennifer+Jefferson.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiv137Ix-4kyV1gvyLw0ck5ZeLklqoGpnCwM4G1uzKG7MARQbXIe8adrpDqdgLNjBRLYKJnuAniNEoJZWmcTT4iJXNDsxQ9c5CyqNMJTG2OcmNLUZkxImSYVceNdMaJyksZwa5r/s1600/Jeremy+and+John+Turner.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiv137Ix-4kyV1gvyLw0ck5ZeLklqoGpnCwM4G1uzKG7MARQbXIe8adrpDqdgLNjBRLYKJnuAniNEoJZWmcTT4iJXNDsxQ9c5CyqNMJTG2OcmNLUZkxImSYVceNdMaJyksZwa5r/s320/Jeremy+and+John+Turner.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFn92cIchK4G7BtUc4S1wZ5KZrZT8FSbQGSlCYFd7Ez9VIIPHhBkxFHsMvQpkZ8LKJUFCxVI245-t0_4tQN_w8GhjwkUzcMGu2VWfVc2ZnyrVdjLiDhBhfFxAleDpK8V3_n4Of/s1600/Jeremy+Crowthers+fg+John+Turner.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFn92cIchK4G7BtUc4S1wZ5KZrZT8FSbQGSlCYFd7Ez9VIIPHhBkxFHsMvQpkZ8LKJUFCxVI245-t0_4tQN_w8GhjwkUzcMGu2VWfVc2ZnyrVdjLiDhBhfFxAleDpK8V3_n4Of/s320/Jeremy+Crowthers+fg+John+Turner.jpg" width="240" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHMno8Tf8Nc1cL-8RjI_G1tJXElGeGPQ2VC19S0aTsJqZ6iJ3sSgZwQMc8VeddHCNiHGrqhakg2bQ7_HvnO1vx_jILPmSCLkUk0zDfd4drXx__U-D4nKKtXS7Zhdjqw44-78sa/s1600/John+Turner.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiHMno8Tf8Nc1cL-8RjI_G1tJXElGeGPQ2VC19S0aTsJqZ6iJ3sSgZwQMc8VeddHCNiHGrqhakg2bQ7_HvnO1vx_jILPmSCLkUk0zDfd4drXx__U-D4nKKtXS7Zhdjqw44-78sa/s320/John+Turner.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQJCA_7n3NhChR9f3US18aTVFQyy6oX-xecG2z-8RC-n2ihWaAmmwit0h7k-TcDu0iPmbGU3x_8eSJg1Kcm2Xm9RliNGJ4R_TcKtyHzzehQA05GMPmV60sYk1sSsk1Gm0XCl48/s1600/Kyle+Andre.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQJCA_7n3NhChR9f3US18aTVFQyy6oX-xecG2z-8RC-n2ihWaAmmwit0h7k-TcDu0iPmbGU3x_8eSJg1Kcm2Xm9RliNGJ4R_TcKtyHzzehQA05GMPmV60sYk1sSsk1Gm0XCl48/s320/Kyle+Andre.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6LgRZqsPNvx2BOmVBMgd5Dh7FG4Nv46NXEdnvg49F9XOZawJWolywQM-XnRJcsgQiGiHtCgAmGQIehHlsavlhc3G-2-8PLoM7yBlH1R9QJYcTexYjeKAMWszX1VgsmiSG9CB6/s1600/Mike+2.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg6LgRZqsPNvx2BOmVBMgd5Dh7FG4Nv46NXEdnvg49F9XOZawJWolywQM-XnRJcsgQiGiHtCgAmGQIehHlsavlhc3G-2-8PLoM7yBlH1R9QJYcTexYjeKAMWszX1VgsmiSG9CB6/s320/Mike+2.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKmOt7I1zV0dlADVGlFmktTDLuPYBkXo3eOeWX4eI4tpihsIuHIxloaHF6JmfjrFOLlRU9gZAdkEmwZKl9gzZp7Ulw2JshBHewS87ccCTQze_Gm0pQ9tTqUbJxTt2EIJg-6eSk/s1600/Mike+Bayles.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKmOt7I1zV0dlADVGlFmktTDLuPYBkXo3eOeWX4eI4tpihsIuHIxloaHF6JmfjrFOLlRU9gZAdkEmwZKl9gzZp7Ulw2JshBHewS87ccCTQze_Gm0pQ9tTqUbJxTt2EIJg-6eSk/s320/Mike+Bayles.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgm6L6lK1tlj67-cwDbCMjLEnUovwcCvyoSnbCxt8k7_zglQss9lYxYwlb27mOM2MZyHOVZfoKV2X7TIopTnEaxEjbscA8b8b0lhWyPrRVgjNWMFVTdm6O_04_8C8KEkr0RHq6B/s1600/Sal+Marici.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgm6L6lK1tlj67-cwDbCMjLEnUovwcCvyoSnbCxt8k7_zglQss9lYxYwlb27mOM2MZyHOVZfoKV2X7TIopTnEaxEjbscA8b8b0lhWyPrRVgjNWMFVTdm6O_04_8C8KEkr0RHq6B/s320/Sal+Marici.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVLGV5GXXa1WPWLjSpsuTlngByxcBj5F0Kpmv691Tb9NV_qGoxVD4REZdlror2VdKWjWIJf8hOcPDwzxlcqtstZctG6cjaD9zJG6ZR-Rw8LQnKW3EiF0wX_LQzUdskxBD8mFAX/s1600/Sign.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVLGV5GXXa1WPWLjSpsuTlngByxcBj5F0Kpmv691Tb9NV_qGoxVD4REZdlror2VdKWjWIJf8hOcPDwzxlcqtstZctG6cjaD9zJG6ZR-Rw8LQnKW3EiF0wX_LQzUdskxBD8mFAX/s320/Sign.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnpSaktAv-RX5d6yRwO_J5-dpmzOJo4MUgCbwOdxP1iWrH-DfMalyTiPZP8gRAlfdw_VttpMHbJuVvtJbfoKahqpSiCFuE0KRpwXjEiHh6cJMAHj77apKaGL12G5UJOmSlc92r/s1600/The+crowd.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnpSaktAv-RX5d6yRwO_J5-dpmzOJo4MUgCbwOdxP1iWrH-DfMalyTiPZP8gRAlfdw_VttpMHbJuVvtJbfoKahqpSiCFuE0KRpwXjEiHh6cJMAHj77apKaGL12G5UJOmSlc92r/s320/The+crowd.jpg" width="320" height="240" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZhTZG0HQRuHx4qQSy7u-uRsSssZLi3m22AByh5R9Twu_L-fswySmFpq9wM1sc_lnVdcegWr4gI82HXcJ1TNPtpYd7NnaeQ3QKZ_E1wmAYYsVghv2LM97p1lznDNNeRtdSyTqQ/s1600/100+TPC+%2540+Western.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZhTZG0HQRuHx4qQSy7u-uRsSssZLi3m22AByh5R9Twu_L-fswySmFpq9wM1sc_lnVdcegWr4gI82HXcJ1TNPtpYd7NnaeQ3QKZ_E1wmAYYsVghv2LM97p1lznDNNeRtdSyTqQ/s320/100+TPC+%2540+Western.jpg" width="320" height="180" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhcMpOdixsCtbXajanJv4vjpiVEbYQlpScfbRoW6KZVqKtR4aLxS13_Fs1ZHCGmFigE7y_gqrRdE54oxgPIf0RT32et_sOsYgDecyJYrsX4USsSNkLG-dttfTE0Rz2VUt4Nn60e/s1600/100+TPC+%2540+WIU.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhcMpOdixsCtbXajanJv4vjpiVEbYQlpScfbRoW6KZVqKtR4aLxS13_Fs1ZHCGmFigE7y_gqrRdE54oxgPIf0RT32et_sOsYgDecyJYrsX4USsSNkLG-dttfTE0Rz2VUt4Nn60e/s320/100+TPC+%2540+WIU.jpg" width="320" height="180" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgJBgq1Xc8qltjfn0xvLMEvdsWK6Xm_qVDJbxq0gSjJjRLnmglTrPjZCG-5KUQUneXbNd_LVbSJYuGzFrP7wRHJ3WH-caH4NKsOegNYtYRy7BJ1QGCfHUu1gTAiDEz9rfV-GeB/s1600/100+TPC+Aubrey+Barnes+%2540+Theos.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhgJBgq1Xc8qltjfn0xvLMEvdsWK6Xm_qVDJbxq0gSjJjRLnmglTrPjZCG-5KUQUneXbNd_LVbSJYuGzFrP7wRHJ3WH-caH4NKsOegNYtYRy7BJ1QGCfHUu1gTAiDEz9rfV-GeB/s320/100+TPC+Aubrey+Barnes+%2540+Theos.jpg" width="180" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnj9eaTC0P-ONpBw86FZS6FrO2trYym5MpzCxQVfcbhyphenhyphenmtPwVdp_L-VTIKGeZkJuWhunEbD1f_Bh55Ys6oWtWMH_dcHEbQNLr6a-kqx3dRwhZW7qTFNmmm0XxRfsJKh5ndvNwP/s1600/100+TPC+Aubrey.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnj9eaTC0P-ONpBw86FZS6FrO2trYym5MpzCxQVfcbhyphenhyphenmtPwVdp_L-VTIKGeZkJuWhunEbD1f_Bh55Ys6oWtWMH_dcHEbQNLr6a-kqx3dRwhZW7qTFNmmm0XxRfsJKh5ndvNwP/s320/100+TPC+Aubrey.jpg" width="180" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRYbvHJ_0q_yaTF5EwBldwoCxahKix37MjpIpIL99xKVQd5NlrJwZXTWOfxeRV2e34OEH_zdudpapRWrZKAIqzv_wBYSoi_YzZ4Tmjlcv0jPcqPPSN88UrIYpz64BNdTQhhG0N/s1600/100+TPC+Dallas+Whitefeld+%2540+Theos.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRYbvHJ_0q_yaTF5EwBldwoCxahKix37MjpIpIL99xKVQd5NlrJwZXTWOfxeRV2e34OEH_zdudpapRWrZKAIqzv_wBYSoi_YzZ4Tmjlcv0jPcqPPSN88UrIYpz64BNdTQhhG0N/s320/100+TPC+Dallas+Whitefeld+%2540+Theos.jpg" width="180" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqIAXJbw0LSDh5GbxOAkv8DZMQhVxfrDANdHT5f8uUOOe_2JZDd0EM7LqUrf9Qv0d1RWmF8Mgm9tORPHXASSeS4cDAhUlwm3gtuSeSQ-psaYw83m6FzMYIUEAtkpPerhRs3Hxk/s1600/100+TPC+Dallas+Whitefield+Theos.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqIAXJbw0LSDh5GbxOAkv8DZMQhVxfrDANdHT5f8uUOOe_2JZDd0EM7LqUrf9Qv0d1RWmF8Mgm9tORPHXASSeS4cDAhUlwm3gtuSeSQ-psaYw83m6FzMYIUEAtkpPerhRs3Hxk/s320/100+TPC+Dallas+Whitefield+Theos.jpg" width="180" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKNGhB35ap4h4kXIK53RrDsUKwT5y4RmO_HqKhILHVN8yH_r_WzQNj0sn-t6nUeeg_VEU98UUGtlDPwWkrJcoyY4a7BiLCD0Z5l164VUAlvcsVNs_hQpVpoIrLmooUIXr1NkzL/s1600/100+TPC+Kevin+%2540+Theos.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKNGhB35ap4h4kXIK53RrDsUKwT5y4RmO_HqKhILHVN8yH_r_WzQNj0sn-t6nUeeg_VEU98UUGtlDPwWkrJcoyY4a7BiLCD0Z5l164VUAlvcsVNs_hQpVpoIrLmooUIXr1NkzL/s320/100+TPC+Kevin+%2540+Theos.jpg" width="180" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJv7tls7-QZjaPNCY-fG-GFYePDRC2CpGP2-ZzdQmcZRX9T_-1lbH74wAiTTsrFXREdRrD9JWM2ih6S4DfIrJ0fb5PlMZHZS4gqTDUuudfLvk9OgKub6pYGgIQC7XhUb4tdGDO/s1600/100+TPC+Kevin+Mitola+%2540+Theos.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJv7tls7-QZjaPNCY-fG-GFYePDRC2CpGP2-ZzdQmcZRX9T_-1lbH74wAiTTsrFXREdRrD9JWM2ih6S4DfIrJ0fb5PlMZHZS4gqTDUuudfLvk9OgKub6pYGgIQC7XhUb4tdGDO/s320/100+TPC+Kevin+Mitola+%2540+Theos.jpg" width="180" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNDk0A_uy-FuRmMMXyrtBl3lhXcBXyd4eyhWypJyoDFN2MslL97xDUrKHKubx79PDJu5zFvPbpsJ9cBFnP_hCwHZJdqL_b3smP9ydb035XxSuu6K2I3mvgR7trTvxGVvEmMTH0/s1600/100+TPC+Kevin+Mitola+%2540+WIU.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNDk0A_uy-FuRmMMXyrtBl3lhXcBXyd4eyhWypJyoDFN2MslL97xDUrKHKubx79PDJu5zFvPbpsJ9cBFnP_hCwHZJdqL_b3smP9ydb035XxSuu6K2I3mvgR7trTvxGVvEmMTH0/s320/100+TPC+Kevin+Mitola+%2540+WIU.jpg" width="320" height="180" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1qrU3El3DrMakYZE-ykiDiPx4ILLLR5XmsI9mgD9QPMphx4rwfdYTf-SqVv1_NgnnoZsiVVibbhI4-ys0KzTiSLR3lmxa7X56daQO2kyhkZ79sJrk8mPiVxwqSPhsyVIVkzpf/s1600/100+TPC+Kevin+Mitola+at+Western.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1qrU3El3DrMakYZE-ykiDiPx4ILLLR5XmsI9mgD9QPMphx4rwfdYTf-SqVv1_NgnnoZsiVVibbhI4-ys0KzTiSLR3lmxa7X56daQO2kyhkZ79sJrk8mPiVxwqSPhsyVIVkzpf/s320/100+TPC+Kevin+Mitola+at+Western.jpg" width="320" height="180" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7LKVqBmkduMUC5l2fMzi3goYta9Jl1Ne0u3J-idkTc4N1YDYXVBd4qhN7wbklZiLlskAJJ5ucW-NzxS6vmyog9Bw4cALQ754cKEzqRetI3lWziQbkC_qdsIhs7m2oNFR72hOR/s1600/100+TPC+Rick+%2540+Theos.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg7LKVqBmkduMUC5l2fMzi3goYta9Jl1Ne0u3J-idkTc4N1YDYXVBd4qhN7wbklZiLlskAJJ5ucW-NzxS6vmyog9Bw4cALQ754cKEzqRetI3lWziQbkC_qdsIhs7m2oNFR72hOR/s320/100+TPC+Rick+%2540+Theos.jpg" width="180" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiuDhrjuNZ5Z1_8PUDlNsnySCt-Nd7Wq5Wr0Ih_33NCLTRWQfl08-7hOhmfb6qPInNncnVy8Iym6Cd8w3GqSyAnIW-WQXUGE-OvTH2wK89uAUtqGXptRKjo5whl-FZvqoBLd4ya/s1600/100+TPC+Rick+doing+John+Prine+Theos.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiuDhrjuNZ5Z1_8PUDlNsnySCt-Nd7Wq5Wr0Ih_33NCLTRWQfl08-7hOhmfb6qPInNncnVy8Iym6Cd8w3GqSyAnIW-WQXUGE-OvTH2wK89uAUtqGXptRKjo5whl-FZvqoBLd4ya/s320/100+TPC+Rick+doing+John+Prine+Theos.jpg" width="180" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUWDcZ0q9Px-LwIoqlE0sqZBh4tRS_uNhcS_FcuZ2T-KVk1sbUa-h8kgZJljpIuLQfE4S0FekZRESk77fQDLYdUAi_8aJzjIiQCnZFU1cMRZQT9NCJB-S8l9YEs5NlJETBW1tD/s1600/100+TPC+Rick+Theos.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUWDcZ0q9Px-LwIoqlE0sqZBh4tRS_uNhcS_FcuZ2T-KVk1sbUa-h8kgZJljpIuLQfE4S0FekZRESk77fQDLYdUAi_8aJzjIiQCnZFU1cMRZQT9NCJB-S8l9YEs5NlJETBW1tD/s320/100+TPC+Rick+Theos.jpg" width="180" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjOG1bCt2tM7P85j2-dXHThdaeRzmKiFjUUhk3N4IdxM2tT_d9_Oozo9_VITGzNwU5CLNbEttOd97_tN_r442iAdGtW1TLgDMXb5MKSJYg1UaN2MvdP_B2z58DF7aAOim_197Sz/s1600/100+TPC+Wayne+%2540+Theos.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjOG1bCt2tM7P85j2-dXHThdaeRzmKiFjUUhk3N4IdxM2tT_d9_Oozo9_VITGzNwU5CLNbEttOd97_tN_r442iAdGtW1TLgDMXb5MKSJYg1UaN2MvdP_B2z58DF7aAOim_197Sz/s320/100+TPC+Wayne+%2540+Theos.jpg" width="320" height="180" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhtj4sRm-4x_XzZ4719AsNyQObNTYtzW2NQiriesq-v01aj1UV0ytW4toQzGUiq1eZk9eFOu3l5WfVquqLC4HoiMpF-ZFXgZ4LpGYOKwjfmd5Bhn0qg5zOytRu7BdR4vA32BVky/s1600/100+TPC+Wayne+Sapp+Theos.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhtj4sRm-4x_XzZ4719AsNyQObNTYtzW2NQiriesq-v01aj1UV0ytW4toQzGUiq1eZk9eFOu3l5WfVquqLC4HoiMpF-ZFXgZ4LpGYOKwjfmd5Bhn0qg5zOytRu7BdR4vA32BVky/s320/100+TPC+Wayne+Sapp+Theos.jpg" width="180" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwUImhMdZJ2ZgFlEo6yYEzBAxbaXrkS8FXPCEEJt4sIU43WV2zDslQGwrW4BaIs37XJYzhoPIIzt6uQTMb5OeBrrWd5nJyQ5MbEfYbudFzYnDTlyaR-uxEcf12FF6y-jEphzDp/s1600/100TPC+at+Western.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwUImhMdZJ2ZgFlEo6yYEzBAxbaXrkS8FXPCEEJt4sIU43WV2zDslQGwrW4BaIs37XJYzhoPIIzt6uQTMb5OeBrrWd5nJyQ5MbEfYbudFzYnDTlyaR-uxEcf12FF6y-jEphzDp/s320/100TPC+at+Western.jpg" width="320" height="180" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhja8OVKUqlV377MHY-giGrMjLF0jzuMuag8rMNKpVf7h5M3PrAbakiser_BjOCHP3MGOe3aFUR_pmrfQcx_l28u5HPyhLRDSUW4-3DHm47GwCM6PHBnHhPql2VSvko4Kl0nQbz/s1600/100TPC+at+WIU.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhja8OVKUqlV377MHY-giGrMjLF0jzuMuag8rMNKpVf7h5M3PrAbakiser_BjOCHP3MGOe3aFUR_pmrfQcx_l28u5HPyhLRDSUW4-3DHm47GwCM6PHBnHhPql2VSvko4Kl0nQbz/s320/100TPC+at+WIU.jpg" width="320" height="180" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipqPfN0z_EBwBnjv1NuYLj98PvqPCRmB6oDgZ5XW7kKPURUJfwItUlpEqLqmSHsEeQNn1N_tUKvAnYZqWr7QaadoMlmLY-KjYe9tatN7IjTioeMGtj-328YbpKEIITzpKbRUO9/s1600/199+TPC+Dallas+Whitefeld.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipqPfN0z_EBwBnjv1NuYLj98PvqPCRmB6oDgZ5XW7kKPURUJfwItUlpEqLqmSHsEeQNn1N_tUKvAnYZqWr7QaadoMlmLY-KjYe9tatN7IjTioeMGtj-328YbpKEIITzpKbRUO9/s320/199+TPC+Dallas+Whitefeld.jpg" width="180" height="320" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUlltePsQRjE0u6uRUWLfglpC_TYqEOz2wa8dRRh9bWca7X4sBCoSfhsfZZVbxQsTBvfKx61XLJeIjW2_g-WIDegF3l82OaG8UNI_tRcxXp3X-VVA5jtT1QVOsJzniuEcIbuUD/s1600/2016+100tpc.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUlltePsQRjE0u6uRUWLfglpC_TYqEOz2wa8dRRh9bWca7X4sBCoSfhsfZZVbxQsTBvfKx61XLJeIjW2_g-WIDegF3l82OaG8UNI_tRcxXp3X-VVA5jtT1QVOsJzniuEcIbuUD/s320/2016+100tpc.jpg" width="320" height="247" /></a><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWNnSYauBqm5MDckPyKVIXIOHKK2_NhceqxN7zV4cNKCsVWV61dDao65MDY-BWh_0KEVSehckqbB2epzKTF4KCwOlw1U1_BCiyztucbotiZMHXhTKxvZu5MGTSj3IJYOu4D0Xr/s1600/100000+Mimes.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWNnSYauBqm5MDckPyKVIXIOHKK2_NhceqxN7zV4cNKCsVWV61dDao65MDY-BWh_0KEVSehckqbB2epzKTF4KCwOlw1U1_BCiyztucbotiZMHXhTKxvZu5MGTSj3IJYOu4D0Xr/s320/100000+Mimes.jpg" width="320" height="80" /></a>Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33364853.post-34804043798035148212016-11-14T12:51:00.000-06:002016-11-14T12:51:28.918-06:00Novel formsI have been re-reading the chapters of "My Accursed Novel" as I have called it and I have started to see that they are not really that bad. In fact, I think some of the chapters are quite good. The problem is that I can't really get it into the appropriate "novel format," which is a consistency of time with a recognizable plot. But then, I don't write traditionally any more with ANY format, so why would I think that I could or would write a traditionally structured novel? <br />
<br />
So, now that all of this stuff is out there and has been seen and read by at least a dozen of you (I am of course being modest. It looks like 2 dozen people have actually read the stories). But there has to be an even wonkier way of organizing this work.<br />
<br />
If you have any thoughts, let me know! Fluffy Singlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04701630502844869849noreply@blogger.com0